The effect of visual motion stimulus characteristics on vection and visually induced motion sickness

被引:50
|
作者
Keshavarz, Behrang [1 ,2 ]
Philipp-Muller, Aaron Emile [3 ]
Hemmerich, Wanja [4 ]
Riecke, Bernhard E. [5 ]
Campos, Jennifer L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Rehabil Inst UHN, iDAPT, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[5] Simon Fraser Univ, SIAT, Surrey, BC, Canada
关键词
Optic flow; Self-motion; Speed; Density; Axis rotation; Cybersickness; Simulator sickness; Virtual reality; SELF-MOTION; SPEED; ROTATION; ROLL; CYBERSICKNESS; PRECEDES; VELOCITY; PITCH; TILT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.displa.2018.07.005
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Several factors contribute to the likelihood of experiencing illusory sensations of self-motion (i.e., vection) in Virtual Reality (VR) applications. VR users can also experience adverse effects such as disorientation, oculomotor issues, or nausea known as visually induced motion sickness (VIMS). The goal of the present study was to systematically investigate three characteristics of visual motion stimuli-speed, density, and axis of rotation and how they relate to both vection and VIMS. Two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, a stereoscopic stimulus containing a star field of white spheres on a black background was presented to 21 participants. The stimulus contained linear forward motion (expanding optic flow) and was varied with respect to (a) speed (faster, slower) and (b) density (lower, higher). Ratings of vection (onset time, intensity, duration), VIMS (measured via FMS, SSQ), and presence were recorded. In Experiment 1 vection was found to be strongest under faster and higher density conditions. VIMS was overall minimal and not affected by either speed or density. In Experiment 2, rotation along the pitch, yaw, or roll axes were added to the stimulus that created the strongest vection in Experiment 1, resulting in spiral/curvilinear motion profiles. Again, subjective ratings of vection, VIMS, and presence were collected. Results showed that vection intensity was significantly increased when pitch or roll rotation were added to forward motion. Despite overall low VIMS scores, pitch rotation resulted in the highest FMS scores and significantly greater disorientation as measured by the SSQ. No correlations between the vection and VIMS measures were observed. Overall, these results suggest that all three stimulus' characteristics (density, speed, added rotations) can alter the sensation of vection and can have additive effects, but that this increase in vection is not necessarily associated with increases in VIMS.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 81
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of Visually Induced Motion Sickness in Immersive Videos
    Duan, Huiyu
    Zhai, Guangtao
    Min, Xiongkuo
    Zhu, Yucheng
    Sun, Wei
    Yang, Xiaokang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION PROCESSING - PCM 2017, PT I, 2018, 10735 : 662 - 672
  • [42] Influence of Fixation Point Movement on Visually Induced Motion Sickness Suppression Effect
    Miura, Naoki
    Hiroyasu, Ujike
    Ohkura, Michiko
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AFFECTIVE AND PLEASURABLE DESIGN, 2019, 774 : 277 - 288
  • [43] Robust global motion estimation in video stabilization for reducing visually induced motion sickness
    Tsubaki, I
    Morita, T
    Aizawa, K
    Saito, T
    [J]. VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS AND IMAGE PROCESSING 2006, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6077
  • [44] Vection is the main contributor to motion sickness induced by visual yaw rotation: Implications for conflict and eye movement theories
    Nooij, Suzanne A. E.
    Pretto, Paolo
    Oberfeld, Daniel
    Hecht, Heiko
    Buelthoff, Heinrich H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [45] Visually induced motion sickness: Single- versus dual-axis motion
    Diels, Cyriel
    Howarth, Peter A.
    [J]. DISPLAYS, 2011, 32 (04) : 175 - 180
  • [46] Unstable coupling of body sway with imposed motion precedes visually induced motion sickness
    Walter, Hannah J.
    Li, Ruixuan
    Munafo, Justin
    Curry, Christopher
    Peterson, Nicolette
    Stoffregen, Thomas A.
    [J]. HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 64 : 389 - 397
  • [47] Investigation of the Correlation Between the Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire and the Turkish Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire
    Ugur, Emel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2024, 28 (01): : 36 - 43
  • [48] EFFECTS OF PHENYTOIN ON VECTION-INDUCED MOTION SICKNESS AND GASTRIC MYOELECTRIC ACTIVITY
    STERN, RM
    UIJTDEHAAGE, SHJ
    MUTH, ER
    KOCH, KL
    [J]. AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1994, 65 (06): : 518 - 521
  • [49] The Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ): Estimating Individual Susceptibility to Motion Sickness-Like Symptoms When Using Visual Devices
    Keshavarz, Behrang
    Murovec, Brandy
    Mohanathas, Niroshica
    Golding, John F.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 65 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [50] Visual stress, its treatment with spectral filters, and its relationship to visually induced motion sickness
    Wilkins, Arnold Jonathan
    Evans, Bruce J. W.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2010, 41 (04) : 509 - 515