Efficacy of Chemotherapy Integrated With Traditional Korean Medicine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Eun Hye [1 ]
Yoon, Jee-Hyun [2 ]
Yoon, Sung Soo [1 ]
Lee, Jee Young [1 ]
Yoon, Seong Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Clin Korean Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
pancreatic cancer; Korean medicine; herb; chemotherapy; Rhus verniciflua; Astragalus; CELL LUNG-CANCER; RHUS-VERNICIFLUA STOKES; CHINESE MEDICINE; ASTRAGALUS POLYSACCHARIDES; METAANALYSIS; THERAPY; EXTRACT; SAFETY; LIVER;
D O I
10.1177/1534735420983457
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy (CTX) integrated with Traditional Korean Medicine (TKM) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, in a single Korean center. Methods: From January, 2014 to February, 2019, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received CTX were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), demographic characteristics, and adverse events were examined. Statistical analysis was utilized to evaluate the differences in characteristics and to compare the survival rates between the CTX group and CTX+TKM group. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the differences in survival time. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratio of the risk of mortality. Results: A total 37 participants were included and visited a TKM hospital 7.4 +/- 8.3 months after being diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The median age of the participants was 62 years; 26 patients (70.3%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status between 0 and 2, and 23 patients (62.2 %) had first-line CTX failure. The median OS of all patients was 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-4.6). The CTX + TKM group showed longer survival (4.1 months; 95% CI, 2.4- .8) than the CTX group (2.4 months, 95% CI 0.2-4.6) but this was not statistically significant (P = .217). Chemotherapy with TKM treatment for more than 30 days (CTX + TKM >= 30) significantly prolonged median OS (9.1 months; 95% CI, 3.6-14.5; P = .025) compared to chemotherapy alone. Cox hazard ratio analysis revealed that CTX + TKM >= 30 and prior chemotherapy were significantly independent prognostic factors for OS. The main herbs in the TKM treatment were Rhus verniciflua Stokes and Astragalus. Severe adverse events with respect to TKM treatment were not reported. Conclusions: TKM treatment integrated with chemotherapy may prolong OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to chemotherapy treatment alone. More rigorous prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm this result.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in older patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective study
    Shuhei Nagashima
    Satoshi Kobayashi
    Shotaro Tsunoda
    Yui Yamachika
    Yuichiro Tozuka
    Taito Fukushima
    Manabu Morimoto
    Makoto Ueno
    Junji Furuse
    Shin Maeda
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024, 29 : 188 - 194
  • [42] Extended lymphadenectomy benefits patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer-a single-center retrospective study
    Wang, Jing
    Lyu, Shao-Cheng
    Zhu, Ji-Qiao
    Li, Xian-Liang
    Lang, Ren
    He, Qiang
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (10) : 2910 - 2924
  • [43] Efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer "in a Korean" population: A single-center cohort study
    Cho, In Rae
    Kang, Huapyong
    Jo, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Park, Seung Woo
    Song, Si Young
    Chung, Jae Bock
    An, Chansik
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Jung, So Young
    Bang, Seungmin
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 44 (06) : 420 - 427
  • [44] Retrospective single center review of toxicity and efficacy of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
    Pulluri, Bhargavi
    Skelly, Joan
    Barry, Maura Meredith
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04)
  • [45] Efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - updated data from a retrospective analysis of a single center experience
    Biesenbaum, D.
    Kind, M.
    Ruessel, J.
    Mueller-Tidow, C.
    Schmoll, H-J
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 37 : 82 - 83
  • [46] Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism A single-center study
    Oh, Sang-Bo
    Seol, Young-Mi
    Kim, Hyo-Jeong
    Choi, Young-Jin
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (30) : e16514
  • [47] Pancreatic Resection in Older Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Outcome Analysis
    Ruess, Dietrich A.
    Biesel, Esther A.
    Kuehlbrey, Christian M.
    Chikhladze, Sophia
    Hipp, Julian
    Luenstedt, Jost
    Fichtner-Feigl, Stefan
    Hopt, Ulrich T.
    Wittel, Uwe A.
    SURGERIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 30 - 45
  • [48] The efficacy of rehabilitation for elderly chronic kidney disease patients: a retrospective, single-center study
    Erez Sarel
    Naomi Nacasch
    Ilan Rozenberg
    Rachel Heffez Ayzenfeld
    Sydney Benchetrit
    Jacob Feldman
    Keren Cohen-Hagai
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2022, 34 : 1399 - 1406
  • [49] The efficacy of rehabilitation for elderly chronic kidney disease patients: a retrospective, single-center study
    Sarel, Erez
    Nacasch, Naomi
    Rozenberg, Ilan
    Ayzenfeld, Rachel Heffez
    Benchetrit, Sydney
    Feldman, Jacob
    Cohen-Hagai, Keren
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (06) : 1399 - 1406
  • [50] Docetaxel rechallenge in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A retrospective, single-center study
    Byeon, Seonggyu
    Kim, Hyera
    Kim, Jinchul
    Kwon, Minsuk
    Hur, Joon Young
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Park, Se Hoon
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 61 (06) : 588 - 593