How does the selection of national development zones affect urban green innovation?-Evidence from China

被引:2
|
作者
Yu, Xiaolin [1 ]
Wan, Kai [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Business & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 08期
关键词
FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES; PREFERENTIAL POLICIES; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; PLACE; COMPETITIVENESS; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0268111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The launch of the selection process for National Development Zones(NDZs) marked a fundamental change in the construction of development zones, making it an essential position for local authorities to implement high-quality development. Based on the data of prefecture-level cities in China from 2000 to 2018, this paper examines the impact and mechanism of selecting NDZs on urban green innovation through a double-difference spatial durbin model using the selection of NDZs as a "quasi-natural experiment". The study finds that the selection of NDZs can promote green innovation in cities and has a significant window-radiating effect. The heterogeneity test results show that the implementation of the selection policy for development zones in non-old industrial cities, large and medium-sized cities, cities with easy access to transportation, and cities with high market orientation are more likely to promote urban green innovation. At the same time, the higher the level of government governance and the better the level of economic development of the development zones, the more it helps to realize the effects of the selection policy. The results of the mechanism test show that the selection of NDZs has a positive impact on urban green innovation through environmental regulation effects, resource allocation effects, and policy amplification effects.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does technological innovation in National Sustainable Development Agenda Innovation Demonstration Zones promote green development?-the case from Chengde City, China
    Yuan, Qingqing
    Zhang, Guofeng
    Wang, Ruixian
    Ma, Xiaojing
    Niu, Jiangao
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [42] How does audit quality affect firm innovation? Evidence from China
    Hsu, Charles
    Wu, Chaopeng
    Yan, Zehao
    Zhu, Ruichao
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2024,
  • [43] How does climate risk affect corporate innovation? Evidence from China
    Li, Bin
    Yao, Yao
    Usman, Muhammad
    Han, Miaodi
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023,
  • [44] How does environmental legislation guide urban green transition development? Evidence from China
    Zhou, Junting
    Yu, Xuewei
    Chen, Xue
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 345
  • [45] How do green bonds affect green technology innovation? Firm evidence from China
    Lin, Tao
    Du, Mingyue
    Ren, Siyu
    GREEN FINANCE, 2022, 4 (04): : 492 - 511
  • [46] How does a good environment affect firms' productivity? evidence from urban public green spaces in China
    Yang, Yalin
    Ji, Xing
    Deng, Liqian
    Ma, Rufei
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 10
  • [47] How does financial agglomeration affect green development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta of China
    Wen, Yinyin
    Zhao, Min
    Tang, Genli
    Zhou, Xiaoxiao
    Hu, Xingchen
    Sui, Li
    GROWTH AND CHANGE, 2023, 54 (01) : 135 - 156
  • [48] How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China
    Ren, Siyu
    Hao, Yu
    Wu, Haitao
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 81 (01): : 25 - 51
  • [49] How does Environmental Regulation Promote Technological Innovation and Green Development? New Evidence from China
    Li, Hang
    He, Feng
    Deng, Guangjun
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2020, 29 (01): : 689 - 702
  • [50] How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China
    Siyu Ren
    Yu Hao
    Haitao Wu
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 81 : 25 - 51