共 50 条
Impact of patient characteristics on efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus dulaglutide: SUSTAIN 7 post hoc analyses
被引:8
|作者:
Pratley, Richard E.
[1
]
Aroda, Vanita R.
[2
]
Catarig, Andrei-Mircea
[3
]
Lingvay, Ildiko
[4
,5
]
Luedemann, Joerg
[6
,7
]
Yildirim, Emre
[8
]
Viljoen, Adie
[9
]
机构:
[1] AdventHealth, Translat Res Inst, Orlando, FL 32803 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Hypertens, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Novo Nordisk AS, Med & Sci, Soborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Internal Med Endocrinol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Populat & Data Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[6] Diabet Ctr, Diabet Falkensee, Falkensee, Germany
[7] Ctr Clin Studies, Falkensee, Germany
[8] Novo Nordisk AS, Global Med Affairs, Soborg, Denmark
[9] Lister Hosp, Borthwick Diabet Res Ctr, Stevenage, Herts, England
来源:
关键词:
general diabetes;
diabetes &
endocrinology;
clinical trials;
DAILY INSULIN GLARGINE;
OPEN-LABEL;
ADD-ON;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
PHASE;
3A;
TYPE-2;
METFORMIN;
TRIAL;
LIRAGLUTIDE;
PLACEBO;
D O I:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037883
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective In SUSTAIN 7, once-weekly semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and body weight (BW) reductions versus once-weekly dulaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of clinically relevant subject characteristics on treatment effects of semaglutide versus dulaglutide. Design Analyses by baseline age (<65, >= 65 years), sex (male, female), diabetes duration (<= 5, >5-10, >10 years), HbA(1c) (<= 7.5, >7.5-8.5, >8.5% (<= 58, >58-69, >69 mmol/mol)) and body mass index (BMI) (<30, 30-<35, >= 35 kg/m(2)). Setting 194 sites; 16 countries. Participants Subjects with T2D (n=1199) exposed to treatment. Interventions Semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (low-dose comparison); semaglutide 1.0 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg (high-dose comparison), all subcutaneously once weekly. Primary and secondary outcome measures Change in HbA(1c) (primary endpoint) and BW (confirmatory secondary endpoint) from baseline to week 40; proportion of subjects achieving HbA(1c) targets (<7%, <= 6.5% (<53, <= 48 mmol/mol)) and weight-loss responses (>= 5%, >= 10%) at week 40; and safety. Results HbA(1c) and BW reductions (estimated treatment difference ranges: -0.22 to -0.70%-point; -1.76 to -3.84 kg) and proportion of subjects achieving HbA(1c) targets and weight-loss responses were statistically significantly greater for the majority of comparisons of semaglutide versus dulaglutide within each subgroup category and, excepting glycaemic control within the low-dose comparison in HbA(1c) subgroups, this was irrespective of subgroup or dose comparison. Gastrointestinal adverse events, the most common with both treatments, were reported by more women than men and, with semaglutide, decreased with increasing BMI. Conclusions Consistently greater improvements in HbA(1c) and BW with semaglutide versus dulaglutide, regardless of age, sex, diabetes duration, glycaemic control and BMI, support the efficacy of semaglutide across the continuum of care in a heterogeneous population with T2D.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文