Utility-based optimization of phase II/III programs

被引:14
|
作者
Kirchner, Marietta [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
Goette, Heiko [2 ]
Schueler, Armin [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
optimization; expected utility; probability of success; program-wise planning; drug development; SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; III TRIAL; PORTFOLIOS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/sim.6624
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Phase II and phase III trials play a crucial role in drug development programs. They are costly and time consuming and, because of high failure rates in late development stages, at the same time risky investments. Commonly, sample size calculation of phase III is based on the treatment effect observed in phase II. Therefore, planning of phases II and III can be linked. The performance of the phase II/III program crucially depends on the allocation of the resources to phases II and III by appropriate choice of the sample size and the rule applied to decide whether to stop the program after phase II or to proceed. We present methods for a program-wise phase II/III planning that aim at determining optimal phase II sample sizes and go/no-go decisions in a time-to-event setting. Optimization is based on a utility function that takes into account (fixed and variable) costs of the drug development program and potential gains after successful launch. The proposed methods are illustrated by application to a variety of scenarios typically met in oncology drug development. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 316
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Utility-based sensor selection
    Bian, Fang
    Kempe, David
    Govindan, Ramesh
    IPSN 2006: THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, 2006, : 11 - 18
  • [22] Design of an Adaptive Framework for Utility-based Optimization of Scientific Applications in the Cloud
    Koehler, Martin
    Benkner, Siegfried
    2012 IEEE/ACM FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UTILITY AND CLOUD COMPUTING (UCC 2012), 2012, : 303 - 308
  • [23] Design and Implementation of Utility-Based Radio Resource Optimization Using CAPRI
    Rerkrai, Krisakorn
    Nasreddine, Jad
    Wang, Zhou
    Riihijaervi, Janne
    Maehoenen, Petri
    2011 7TH INTERNATIONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND MOBILE COMPUTING CONFERENCE (IWCMC), 2011, : 2262 - 2267
  • [24] UTILITY-BASED MEASURES OF HEALTH
    EVANS, WN
    VISCUSI, WK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 73 (05) : 1422 - 1427
  • [25] Utility-based role exchange
    Zhang, X
    Hexmoor, H
    FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2002, 2296 : 332 - 340
  • [26] On Utility-Based Network Management
    Meshkova, Elena
    Riihijaervi, Janne
    Achtzehn, Andreas
    Maehoenen, Petri
    2010 IEEE GLOBECOM WORKSHOPS, 2010, : 600 - 605
  • [27] Utility-based scheduling for UWB networks using discrete stochastic optimization
    Liu, Kuang-Hao
    Cai, Lin
    Shen, Xuemin
    2007 4TH IEEE CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 624 - +
  • [28] Implementation of Utility-based Resource Optimization Protocols on ITA Sensor Fabric
    Eswaran, Sharanya
    Misra, Archan
    Bergamaschi, Flavio
    La Porta, Thomas
    GROUND/AIR MULTI-SENSOR INTEROPERABILITY, INTEGRATION, AND NETWORKING FOR PERSISTENT ISR, 2010, 7694
  • [29] Utility-Based HTN Planning
    Georgievski, Ilche
    Lazovik, Alexander
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 1013 - 1014
  • [30] Adaptive Utility-Based Recommendation
    Felfernig, Alexander
    Mandl, Monika
    Schippel, Stefan
    Schubert, Monika
    Teppan, Erich
    TRENDS IN APPLIED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6096 : 641 - +