Neoadjuvant mitoxantrone and docetaxel for high-risk localized prostate cancer

被引:28
|
作者
Garzotto, M [1 ]
Myrthue, A
Higano, CS
Beer, TM
机构
[1] Portland VA Med Ctr, Urol Sect, Surg Serv, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Div Urol & Renal Transplantat, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Urol, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Div Oncol, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
关键词
chemotherapy; neoadjuvant; advanced prostate cancer; docetaxel; mitoxantrone;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.11.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Currently available treatment modalities for high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer have limited chances of achieving complete tumor elimination because of either inadequate local or metastatic tumor eradication. The goal of this phase I/II study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel and mitoxantrone before prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 men with high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer underwent weekly treatment with docetaxel (35 mg/m(2)), with increasing doses of mitoxantrone (2-5 mg/m(2)) for a 12 of 16-week treatment cycle before prostatectomy. Testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements were made before and after chemotherapy. Results: The maximally tolerated dose for mitoxantrone was 4 mg/m(2), and the primary toxicity was neutropenia. Testosterone levels were maintained throughout treatment. PSA reductions were observed in 95% of patients, with a median reduction of 41%. The surgery was well tolerated after chemotherapy, without any major complications. Negative surgical margins were attained in 76% of patients. Conclusions: Administration of multi-agent chemotherapy before prostatectomy was safe in this population. This regimen appeared to have antineoplastic activity as evidenced by PSA reductions in the absence of significant testosterone changes. The benefit of chemotherapy for improving surgical margin rates could not be determined outside of a phase III trial because the effect of patient or surgeon factors could not be dissected from the potential effect of neoadjuvant therapy. Continued study of novel agents in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted because this approach allows for the rapid identification of active agents and for molecular investigation into the mechanism of drug activity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 259
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adjuvant docetaxel for high-risk localized prostate cancer: Update of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0521
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Karrison, Theodore
    Sartor, A. Oliver
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Purdy, James
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Garzotto, Mark
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Balogh, Alexander G.
    Rodrigues, George
    Souhami, Luis
    Reaume, M. Neil
    Williams, Scott
    Hannan, Raquibul
    Jones, Christopher U.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Rodgers, Joseph P.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [32] Feasibility of androgen-deprivation and radiation therapy with docetaxel for localized high-risk prostate cancer
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Izumi, Kouji
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (07) : 1324 - 1326
  • [33] Neoadjuvant pamiparib plus abiraterone and ADT for high-risk/very high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results of a prospective study
    Zhuang, J.
    Zhang, S.
    Qiu, X.
    Zhou, F.
    Guo, H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1532 - S1532
  • [34] Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant everolimus in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer
    Vadim S. Koshkin
    Maria C. Mir
    Pedro Barata
    Anita Gul
    Ruby Gupta
    Andrew J. Stephenson
    Jihad Kaouk
    Ryan Berglund
    Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
    Eric A. Klein
    Robert Dreicer
    Jorge A. Garcia
    [J]. Investigational New Drugs, 2019, 37 : 559 - 566
  • [35] Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant everolimus in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer
    Koshkin, Vadim S.
    Mir, Maria C.
    Barata, Pedro
    Gul, Anita
    Gupta, Ruby
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Berglund, Ryan
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Klein, Eric A.
    Dreicer, Robert
    Garcia, Jorge A.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (03) : 559 - 566
  • [36] Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in high-risk prostate cancer
    Bandini, Marco
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Preisser, Felix
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Zaffuto, Emanuele
    Stabile, Armando
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 11 (04) : 425 - 438
  • [37] Neoadjuvant docetaxel and estramustine followed by radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer
    Stefaniak, H
    Wallen, E
    Baggstrom, M
    Godley, P
    Rosenman, J
    Goyal, L
    Whang, Y
    Pruthi, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 190 - 190
  • [38] Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies in high risk localized prostate cancer
    Giannakopoulos, X.
    Stagikas, D.
    Charalabopoulos, A.
    Sofikitis, N.
    Charalabopoulos, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 25 (04): : 469 - 473
  • [39] Neoadjuvant docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with high risk prostate cancer - Comment
    Morris, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03): : 915 - 916
  • [40] Immunosuppressive milieu of high-risk localized prostate cancer
    Ricardo, Victor
    Febles, Adorno
    Adeegbe, Dennis
    Ahsan, Aarif
    Wu, Jiansheng
    Khodadad-Jamayran, Alireza
    Lepor, Herbert
    Wysock, James
    Taneja, Samir
    Huang, William C.
    Balar, Arjun Vasant
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Ren, Qinghu
    Tsirigos, Aristotelis
    Kufe, Donald W.
    Heguy, Adriana
    Wong, Kwok-Kin
    Wise, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)