Methodological Flaws in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Studies on the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis with Stem Cells: A Systematic Review

被引:14
|
作者
Schmitz, Christoph [1 ]
Alt, Christopher [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pearce, David A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Furia, John P. [7 ]
Maffulli, Nicola [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Alt, Eckhard U. [2 ,3 ,6 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Anat, Chair Anat 2, Fac Med, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Isar Klinikum, Gen Management, D-80331 Munich, Germany
[3] InGeneron Inc, Houston, TX 77054 USA
[4] Univ South Dakota, Sanford Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 USA
[5] Sanford Hlth, Sioux Falls, SD 57117 USA
[6] Sanford Res, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 USA
[7] SUN Orthoped Evangel Community Hosp, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
[8] Univ Salerno, Fac Med & Surg, Dept Musculoskeletal Disorders, I-84084 Fisciano, Italy
[9] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Sports & Exercise Med, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, Mile End Hosp, London E1 2AD, England
[10] Keele Univ, Sch Med, Guy Hilton Res Ctr, Sch Pharm & Bioengn, Stoke On Trent ST4 7QB, Staffs, England
[11] Tulane Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Inst Heart & Vasc, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
meta-analyses; primary knee osteoarthritis; stem cells; systematic review; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY; AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION; DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE; 2ND-LOOK ARTHROSCOPIC FINDINGS; BONE-MARROW CONCENTRATE; PROOF-OF-CONCEPT; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; HYALURONIC-ACID;
D O I
10.3390/cells11060965
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
(1) Background: Conclusions of meta-analyses of clinical studies may substantially influence opinions of prospective patients and stakeholders in healthcare. Nineteen meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of primary knee osteoarthritis (pkOA) with stem cells, published between January 2020 and July 2021, came to inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality. It is possible that a separate meta-analysis based on an independent, systematic assessment of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells may reach a different conclusion. (2) Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for clinical studies and meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells. All clinical studies and meta-analyses identified were evaluated in detail, as were all sub-analyses included in the meta-analyses. (3) Results: The inconsistent conclusions regarding the efficacy of treating pkOA with stem cells in the 19 assessed meta-analyses were most probably based on substantial differences in literature search strategies among different authors, misconceptions about meta-analyses themselves, and misconceptions about the comparability of different types of stem cells with regard to their safety and regenerative potential. An independent, systematic review of the literature yielded a total of 183 studies, of which 33 were randomized clinical trials, including a total of 6860 patients with pkOA. However, it was not possible to perform a scientifically sound meta-analysis. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should interpret the results of the 19 assessed meta-analyses of clinical studies on the management of pkOA with stem cells with caution and should be cautious of the conclusions drawn therein. Clinicians and researchers should strive to participate in FDA and/or EMA reviewed and approved clinical trials to provide clinically and statistically valid efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review evaluating the methodological aspects of meta-analyses of genetic association studies in cancer research
    Stefania Boccia
    Emma De Feo
    Paola Gallì
    Francesco Gianfagna
    Rosarita Amore
    Gualtiero Ricciardi
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2010, 25 : 765 - 775
  • [22] Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
    Bafeta, Aida
    Trinquart, Ludovic
    Seror, Raphaele
    Ravaud, Philippe
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [23] An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
    Chambers, James D.
    Naci, Huseyin
    Wouters, Olivier J.
    Pyo, Junhee
    Gunjal, Shalak
    Kennedy, Ian R.
    Hoey, Mark G.
    Winn, Aaron
    Neumann, Peter J.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [24] Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Bair-Merritt, Megan H.
    PEDIATRICS IN REVIEW, 2009, 30 (10) : 409 - 410
  • [25] Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies of glutamine supplementation in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    M Crowther
    A Avenell
    D J Culligan
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2009, 44 : 413 - 425
  • [26] Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies of glutamine supplementation in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Crowther, M.
    Avenell, A.
    Culligan, D. J.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 44 (07) : 413 - 425
  • [27] A methodological review with meta-epidemiological analysis of preclinical systematic reviews with meta-analyses
    Noémie Simon-Tillaux
    Anne-Laure Gerard
    Deivanes Rajendrabose
    Florence Tubach
    Agnès Dechartres
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [28] A methodological review with meta-epidemiological analysis of preclinical systematic reviews with meta-analyses
    Simon-Tillaux, Noemie
    Gerard, Anne-Laure
    Rajendrabose, Deivanes
    Tubach, Florence
    Dechartres, Agnes
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [29] Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
    Bafeta, Aida
    Trinquart, Ludovic
    Seror, Raphaele
    Ravaud, Philippe
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [30] Mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song, Yancheng
    Zhang, Junhui
    Xu, Hualiang
    Lin, Zhujian
    Chang, Hong
    Liu, Wei
    Kong, Ling
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2020, 24 : 121 - 130