Low-dose nuclear microscopy as a necessity for accurate quantitative microanalysis of biological samples

被引:17
|
作者
Maetz, M
Przybylowicz, WJ
Mesjasz-Przybylowicz, J
Schüssler, A
Traxel, K
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Kernphys, D-69029 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Natl Accelerator Ctr, Van de Graaff Grp, ZA-7131 Faure, South Africa
[3] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Bot, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
[4] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Phys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS | 1999年 / 158卷 / 1-4期
关键词
STIM; biology; PIXE; accuracy; damage;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00331-6
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Some aspects of quantitative analysis of biological samples - including a review of the relevant literature - are discussed, Special emphasis is put on the accuracy of trace elemental results despite severe sample damage which occurs during analysis. The occuring mass loss can be corrected by combining quantitative STIM and PIXE. It is also possible to characterize the volatility of most of the minor and trace elements of the sample. The comparison between the presented model and matrix determination with RES, a widely used method, definitely demonstrates that the concentrations obtained using RES correction only may be too high by a factor of two. We recommend at least one low-dose analysis to do correct quantification, (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative phase microscopy of biological samples using a portable interferometer
    Shaked, Natan T.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2012, 37 (11) : 2016 - 2018
  • [22] QUANTITATIVE MICROANALYSIS OF MATRIX-ELEMENTS IN BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY MEV PROTON-SCATTERING
    HULT, M
    THEMNER, K
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1990, 50 (1-4): : 154 - 158
  • [23] Low-dose CT allows for accurate proton dose calculation in esophageal cancer
    Elhamiasl, M.
    Defraene, G.
    Salvo, K.
    Sterpin, E.
    Nuyts, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1394 - S1395
  • [24] BIOLOGICAL DOSE ESTIMATION IN A RADIATION ACCIDENT INVOLVING LOW-DOSE EXPOSURE
    JANSEN, S
    VANHUYSSTEEN, GJ
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 78 (05): : 280 - 282
  • [25] Low-dose quantitative phase contrast medical CT
    Mittone, A.
    Bravin, A.
    Coan, P.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 29 (02)
  • [26] Effects of low-dose cadmium exposure on biological examinations
    Nakadaira, H
    Nishi, S
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 308 (1-3) : 49 - 62
  • [27] LIMITATIONS OF BIOLOGICAL MODELS OF CARCINOGENESIS FOR LOW-DOSE EXTRAPOLATION
    CRUMP, KS
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) : 883 - 886
  • [28] Detection of biological responses to low-dose radiation in humans
    Yamaguchi, Masaru
    Tatara, Yota
    Nugraha, Eka Djatnika
    Ramadhani, Dwi
    Tamakuma, Yuki
    Sato, Yoshiaki
    Miura, Tomisato
    Hosoda, Masahiro
    Yoshinaga, Shinji
    Syaifudin, Mukh
    Kashiwakura, Ikuo
    Tokonami, Shinji
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 184 : 196 - 207
  • [29] Biological effects of low-dose radiation: of harm and hormesis
    Gori, Tommaso
    Muenzel, Thomas
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (03) : 292 - 295
  • [30] Guide to controlling the electron dose to improve low-dose imaging of sensitive samples
    Zak, Andrzej
    MICRON, 2021, 145