Assessment of Left Ventricular Volumes with Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Real-Life Evaluation of Standard versus New Semiautomatic Methods

被引:39
|
作者
Aurich, Matthias [1 ]
Andre, Florian [1 ]
Keller, Marius [1 ]
Greiner, Sebastian [1 ]
Hess, Alexander [1 ]
Buss, Sebastian J. [1 ]
Katus, Hugo A. [1 ]
Mereles, Derliz [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Internal Med 3, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Volumetry; Ejection fraction; Systolic function; TIME 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AUTOMATED BORDER-DETECTION; EJECTION FRACTION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HEART-FAILURE; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; QUANTITATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.echo.2014.07.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Routine quantitative assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes with echocardiography is hindered by time-consuming methods requiring a manual trace of the LV cavity from two apical two-dimensional planes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate faster new semiautomatic echocardiographic methods that could represent a feasible alternative for the assessment of LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in clinical practice. Methods: Two semiautomatic methods, the automated EF (Auto-EF) for two-dimensional echocardiography and the 4D Auto LVQ tool for three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), were compared with the biplane modified Simpson's method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in 47 patients. To evaluate the accuracy of volumetry, additional in vitro measurements using water-filled latex balloons were performed with both modalities. Results: Results of balloon volumetry by echocardiography and CMR measurements were in good agreement with real balloon volumes. The mean LV EF was 45 +/- 11% by Auto-EF, 45 +/- 11% by 3DE, 48 +/- 11% by Simpson's method, and 54 +/- 12% by CMR. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses showed good associations for semiautomatic methods with Simpson's method (Auto-EF, r = 0.85, bias = 3%, limits of agreement [LOA] = 12%; 3DE, r = 0.79, bias = 3%, LOA = 14%), as well as with CMR (Auto-EF, r = 0.74, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%; 3DE, r = 0.73, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%). Intra-and interobserver variability were 6% and 12% with Auto-EF and 8% and 11% with 3DE, respectively. Conclusions: Good correlations between semiautomatic echocardiographic parameters for assessment of LV volumes and EF could be observed when compared with Simpson's method or CMR. However, intertechnique agreement analysis of absolute LV volumes revealed considerable differences, with significant underestimation of volumes and EF with respect to CMR.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1024
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Severity and Left Ventricular Remodeling: AComparative Study of Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Tower-Rader, Albree
    Donnellan, Eoin
    Williams, Louis
    Flamm, Scott
    Griffin, Brian
    Phelan, Dermot
    Kwon, Deborah
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [32] Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment)
    Menhel Kinno
    Prashant Nagpal
    Stephen Horgan
    Alfonso H. Waller
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2017, 19
  • [33] Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment)
    Kinno, Menhel
    Nagpal, Prashant
    Horgan, Stephen
    Waller, Alfonso H.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 19 (01)
  • [34] Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Grover, Suchi
    Leong, Darryl P.
    Selvanayagam, Joseph B.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) : 351 - 365
  • [35] Evaluation of left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Suchi Grover
    Darryl P. Leong
    Joseph B. Selvanayagam
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2011, 18 : 351 - 365
  • [36] Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Correlates With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging In The Assessment Of Right Ventricular Volumes And Function In Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension
    Jone, P. -N.
    Truong, U.
    Cassidy, C.
    Patel, S. S.
    DiMaria, M.
    Fonseca, B.
    Younoszai, A. K.
    Ivy, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [37] Correlating Left Atrial Enlargement and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy on ECG With Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Puthenpura, Max M.
    Sipko, Joseph
    Sankar, Parvathy R.
    Garraud, Cassandra
    Tandon, Animesh
    Lee, Justin
    Bhargava, Ajay
    Menon, Venu
    Kwon, Deborah
    Chung, Mina K.
    Wassif, Heba S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2025, 14 (06):
  • [38] Evaluation of left ventricular mass measured by 3D echocardiography using magnetic resonance imaging as gold standard
    Lenstrup, M.
    Kjaergaard, J.
    Petersen, C. L.
    Kjaer, A.
    Hassager, C.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 66 (08): : 647 - 657
  • [39] Accessory left ventricular chamber in a cat: multimodality imaging description by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
    Bouvard, J.
    Longo, M.
    Schwarz, T.
    Pereira, Y. Martinez
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 28 : 55 - 61
  • [40] Comparison Between 3D Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) in the Measurement of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction
    Benameur, Narjes
    Arous, Younes
    Ben Abdallah, Nejmeddine
    Kraiem, Tarek
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 15 (07) : 654 - 660