Assessment of Left Ventricular Volumes with Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Real-Life Evaluation of Standard versus New Semiautomatic Methods

被引:39
|
作者
Aurich, Matthias [1 ]
Andre, Florian [1 ]
Keller, Marius [1 ]
Greiner, Sebastian [1 ]
Hess, Alexander [1 ]
Buss, Sebastian J. [1 ]
Katus, Hugo A. [1 ]
Mereles, Derliz [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Internal Med 3, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Volumetry; Ejection fraction; Systolic function; TIME 3-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; AUTOMATED BORDER-DETECTION; EJECTION FRACTION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HEART-FAILURE; RECOMMENDATIONS; QUANTIFICATION; QUANTITATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.echo.2014.07.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Routine quantitative assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes with echocardiography is hindered by time-consuming methods requiring a manual trace of the LV cavity from two apical two-dimensional planes. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate faster new semiautomatic echocardiographic methods that could represent a feasible alternative for the assessment of LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in clinical practice. Methods: Two semiautomatic methods, the automated EF (Auto-EF) for two-dimensional echocardiography and the 4D Auto LVQ tool for three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), were compared with the biplane modified Simpson's method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in 47 patients. To evaluate the accuracy of volumetry, additional in vitro measurements using water-filled latex balloons were performed with both modalities. Results: Results of balloon volumetry by echocardiography and CMR measurements were in good agreement with real balloon volumes. The mean LV EF was 45 +/- 11% by Auto-EF, 45 +/- 11% by 3DE, 48 +/- 11% by Simpson's method, and 54 +/- 12% by CMR. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses showed good associations for semiautomatic methods with Simpson's method (Auto-EF, r = 0.85, bias = 3%, limits of agreement [LOA] = 12%; 3DE, r = 0.79, bias = 3%, LOA = 14%), as well as with CMR (Auto-EF, r = 0.74, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%; 3DE, r = 0.73, bias = 9%, LOA = 17%). Intra-and interobserver variability were 6% and 12% with Auto-EF and 8% and 11% with 3DE, respectively. Conclusions: Good correlations between semiautomatic echocardiographic parameters for assessment of LV volumes and EF could be observed when compared with Simpson's method or CMR. However, intertechnique agreement analysis of absolute LV volumes revealed considerable differences, with significant underestimation of volumes and EF with respect to CMR.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1024
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of gated SPECT, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes
    Demir, Hakan
    Tan, Yusuf Z.
    Kozdag, Guliz
    Isgoren, Serkan
    Anik, Yonca
    Ural, Dilek
    Demirci, Ali
    Berk, Fatma
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (06) : 415 - 420
  • [2] Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kim, Jiwon
    Cohen, Scott B.
    Atalay, Michael K.
    Maslow, Andrew D.
    Poppas, Athena
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2015, 32 (05): : 805 - 812
  • [3] Is magnetic resonance imaging the 'Reference standard' for cardiac functional assessment? Factors influencing measurement of left ventricular mass and volumes
    Steen, H.
    Nasir, K.
    Flynn, E.
    El-Shehaby, I.
    Lai, S.
    Katus, H. A.
    Bluemke, D.
    Lima, J. A. C.
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 96 (10) : 743 - 751
  • [4] Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging the 'Reference Standard' for Cardiac Functional Assessment? Factors Influencing Measurement of Left Ventricular Mass and Volumes
    Henning Steen
    Khurram Nasir
    Ellen Flynn
    Iman El-Shehaby
    Shenghan Lai
    Hugo A. Katus
    David Bluemcke
    João A. C. Lima
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2007, 96 : 743 - 751
  • [5] Comparison of methods for evaluation left atrial Volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance
    Labandeiro, J.
    Braco, L. M. B.
    Ferreira, A. F.
    Fiarresga, A. F.
    Galrinho, A. G.
    Timoteo, A. T. T.
    Pereira-Da-Silva, T. P. S.
    Nogueira, N.
    Rio, P. S. R.
    Cruz Ferreira, R. C. F.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 196 - 196
  • [6] Assessment of right ventricular volumes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Bell, Aaron
    Rawlins, Debbie
    Bellsham-Revell, Hannah
    Miller, Owen
    Razavi, Reza
    Simpson, John
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 15 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [7] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Doppler Echocardiography for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis
    Rubinshtein, Ronen
    Glockner, James F.
    Feng, DaLi
    Araoz, Philip A.
    Kirsch, Jacobo
    Syed, Imran S.
    Oh, Jae K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 103 (05): : 718 - 723
  • [8] Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Assessment of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Fabry Disease
    Hazari, Hassan
    Belenkie, Israel
    Kryski, Albert
    White, James A.
    Oudit, Gavin Y.
    Thompson, Richard
    Fung, Tak
    Dehar, Navdeep
    Khan, Aneal
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (08) : 1041 - 1047
  • [9] Comparison of gated SPECT, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular functions
    Demir, H.
    Tan, Y. Z.
    Kozdag, G.
    Anik, Y. Akoz
    Ural, D.
    Balci, C.
    Isgoren, S.
    Berk, F.
    Demirci, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2006, 33 : S119 - S119
  • [10] Comparison of Left Ventricular Function and Mass Assessment on Everyday Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lee, Mirae
    Byeon, Kyeongmin
    Kim, Eun Young
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Lee, Sungho
    Park, Sung Beom
    Chung, Seungmin
    Park, Jeong-Euy
    Choe, Yeon Hyeon
    Lee, Sang-Chol
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)