Impact on plant communities by white-tailed deer in Mississippi, USA
被引:8
|
作者:
Hanberry, Phillip
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USAMississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Hanberry, Phillip
[1
,2
]
Hanberry, Brice B.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USAMississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Hanberry, Brice B.
[2
]
Demarais, Stephen
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USAMississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Demarais, Stephen
[1
]
Leopold, Bruce D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USAMississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Leopold, Bruce D.
[1
]
Fleeman, Jackie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mississippi Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Pk, Wildlife Management Areas, Jackson, MS USAMississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
Fleeman, Jackie
[3
]
机构:
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Aquaculture, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Mississippi Dept Wildlife Fisheries & Pk, Wildlife Management Areas, Jackson, MS USA
Background: The abundance of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the eastern United States has escalated during the twentieth century, potentially impacting plant communities. Methods: We measured understorey plant cover and biomass five years after excluding deer from mature forests of three ecological regions in Mississippi, USA. We extended the significance of P values to 0.10 to detect developing impacts. Results: Deer impacts were limited and varied by ecological region. We recorded 151 species in cover transects. Consistent exclosure treatment effects were detected in two regions where there was greater cover of two deer forages and less cover of three non-forages. Species richness was greater in exclosures in one region, but otherwise species richness and diversity indices did not differ. We recorded 127 species in biomass quadrats. Exclosure treatment effects on biomass were inconsistent. Out of five species with significant differences, three had more biomass in controls, including two deer forages. Except for greater total biomass in controls of one region, there were no differences by growth form or total vegetation for canopy coverage or biomass. Ordination of community canopy cover demonstrated similarity of paired exclosure and controls. Conclusions: Exclosure treatment effects on canopy cover and species richness in two regions indicated limited negative impacts from deer foraging. A time frame of more than five years may be required for exclusion to allow recovery of vegetation, even with relatively open canopies and a long growing season.