Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial

被引:22
|
作者
Bianco, F. [1 ,2 ]
Romano, G. [2 ]
Tsarkov, P. [3 ]
Stanojevic, G. [4 ]
Shroyer, K. [5 ]
Giuratrabocchetta, S. [1 ]
Bergamaschi, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Div Colorectal Surg, Stony Brook, NY USA
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Colorectal Surg, Naples, Italy
[3] Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Moscow, Russia
[4] Sch Univ Nis, Dept Colorectal Surg, Nish, Serbia
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Pathol, Stony Brook, NY USA
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; circumferential resection margin; extralevator abdominoperineal excision; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; STANDARD; INFECTIONS; CARCINOMA; SCIENCE; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/codi.13436
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim A randomized controlled trial was conducted to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in circumferential resection margin (CRM) between extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) and non-ELAPE for rectal cancer. Method This was a multicentre, randomized controlled trial registered as NCT01702116. Patients with rectal cancer involving the external anal sphincter were randomized to ELAPE or non-ELAPE following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Randomization was performed according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The primary end-point was CRM (in mm), defined as the shortest distance between the tumour and the cut edge of the specimen. Pathologists and centralized pathology were blinded to the patients' study arm. Interrater reliability (IRR) was assessed using Kendall's coefficient. Intra-operative perforation (IOP) was any rectal defect determined at pathology. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Participating surgeons were retrained and credentialed. A sample size calculation showed that 34 subjects would provide sufficient power to reject the null hypothesis. Results Thirty-four patients underwent the allocated intervention. Seventeen patients treated with ELAPE were comparable with 17 patients treated with non-ELAPE regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class and pre-existing comorbidities. CRM depth (7.14 +/- 5.76 mm vs 2.98 +/- 3.28 mm, P = 0.016) and involvement rates (5.8% vs 41.0%, P = 0.04) were significantly increased in patients treated with ELAPE. The IRR for CRM was 0.78. There were no significant differences in IOP (5.8% vs 11.7%, P = 0.77) and complication rates (29% vs 29%, P = 0.97). Conclusions ELAPE was associated with statistically improved CRM with no difference in IOP and complication rates compared with non-ELAPE for rectal cancer involving the external anal sphincter.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 157
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A pilot randomized study comparing extralevator with conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation
    Seshadri, R. A.
    West, N. P.
    Sundersingh, S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (07) : O253 - O262
  • [22] A multicenter randomized trial: Collagen implant vs myocutaneous flap for reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum
    Rutegard, Martin
    Rutegard, Jorgen
    Haapamaki, Markku M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [23] A multicenter randomized trial: Collagen implant vs myocutaneous flap for reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum
    Rutegard, Martin
    Rutegard, Joergen
    Haapamaki, Markku M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [24] Postoperative MRI Findings Following Conventional and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Low Rectal Cancer
    Oerskov, Kim Morgenstjerne
    Bondeven, Peter
    Laurberg, Soren
    Hagemann-Madsen, Rikke H.
    Christensen, Henrik Kidmose
    Lauridsen, Henrik
    Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [25] Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer
    Sigmar Stelzner
    Gunter Hellmich
    Anja Sims
    Thomas Kittner
    Eric Puffer
    Joerg Zimmer
    Dorothea Bleyl
    Helmut Witzigmann
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 1729 - 1737
  • [26] Efficacy of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Yu Shen
    Tinghan Yang
    Hanjiang Zeng
    Wenjian Meng
    Ziqiang Wang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 2668 - 2678
  • [27] Efficacy of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Shen, Yu
    Yang, Tinghan
    Zeng, Hanjiang
    Meng, Wenjian
    Wang, Ziqiang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (10) : 2668 - 2678
  • [28] Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer
    Stelzner, Sigmar
    Hellmich, Gunter
    Sims, Anja
    Kittner, Thomas
    Puffer, Eric
    Zimmer, Joerg
    Bleyl, Dorothea
    Witzigmann, Helmut
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (10) : 1729 - 1737
  • [29] Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision in distal rectal cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Liang, Rui
    Yalikun, Dilimulati
    Yang, Jun
    Li, Wenliang
    Kou, Zhiyong
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision in distal rectal cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Rui Liang
    Dilimulati Yalikun
    Jun Yang
    Wenliang Li
    Zhiyong Kou
    BMC Surgery, 22