Uncertainty Quantification Neural Network from Similarity and Sensitivity

被引:3
|
作者
Kabir, H. M. Dipu [1 ]
Khosravi, Abbas [1 ]
Nahavandi, Darius [1 ]
Nahavandi, Saeid [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Intelligent Syst Res & Innovat IISRI, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
Uncertainty Bound; Probabilistic Forecast; Neural Network; Prediction Interval; Uncertainty Quantification; Heteroscedastic Uncertainty; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206746
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) from similar events brings transparency. However, the presence of an irrelevant event may degrade the performance of similarity-based algorithms. This paper presents a UQ technique from similarity and sensitivity. A traditional neural network (NN) for the point prediction is trained at first to obtain the sensitivity of different input parameters at different points. The relative range of each input parameter is set based on sensitivity. When the sensitivity of one parameter is very high, a small deviation in that parameter may result in a large deviation in output. While selecting similar events, we allow a small deviation in highly sensitive parameters and a large deviation in less sensitive parameters. Uncertainty bounds are computed based on similar events. Similar events contain exact matches and slightly different samples. Therefore, we train a NN for bound correction. The bound-corrected uncertainty bounds (UB) provide a fair and domain-independent uncertainty bound. Finally, we train NNs to compute UB directly. The end-user need to run the final NN to obtain UB, instead of following the entire process. The code of the proposed method is also uploaded to Github. Also, users need to run only the fifth script to train a NN of a different UB.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models
    K. S. Kasiviswanathan
    K. P. Sudheer
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2013, 27 : 137 - 146
  • [42] Quantification of the predictive uncertainty of artificial neural network based river flow forecast models
    Kasiviswanathan, K. S.
    Sudheer, K. P.
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2013, 27 (01) : 137 - 146
  • [43] Accelerating uncertainty quantification of groundwater flow modelling using a deep neural network proxy
    Lykkegaard, Mikkel B.
    Dodwell, Tim J.
    Moxey, David
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 383
  • [44] RevPHiSeg: A Memory-Efficient Neural Network for Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation
    Gantenbein, Marc
    Erdil, Ertunc
    Konukoglu, Ender
    [J]. UNCERTAINTY FOR SAFE UTILIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, AND GRAPHS IN BIOMEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, UNSURE 2020, GRAIL 2020, 2020, 12443 : 13 - 22
  • [46] Sensitivity and uncertainty quantification of the cohesive crack model
    Hariri-Ardebili, M. A.
    Saouma, V. E.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2016, 155 : 18 - 35
  • [47] Special Issue: Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification
    Serban, Radu
    Wang, Yan
    Choi, Kyung K.
    Jayakumar, Paramsothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [48] EXTENDED FORWARD SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Zhao, Haihua
    Mousseau, Vincent A.
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 181 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [49] BAYESIAN NETWORK LEARNING FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Hu, Zhen
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2A, 2017,
  • [50] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR RIM SEAL INGESTION WITH 1-D NETWORK MODELS
    Dominguez, Alejandro Pozo
    Hills, Nicholas
    Marques, Simao
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2020: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, VOL 2D, 2020,