Lower Bounds for Differentially Private RAMs

被引:16
|
作者
Persiano, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ]
Yeo, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Google LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
[2] Univ Salerno, Salerno, Italy
关键词
ORAM;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-17653-2_14
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this work, we study privacy-preserving storage primitives that are suitable for use in data analysis on outsourced databases within the differential privacy framework. The goal in differentially private data analysis is to disclose global properties of a group without compromising any individual's privacy. Typically, differentially private adversaries only ever learn global properties. For the case of outsourced databases, the adversary also views the patterns of access to data. Oblivious RAM (ORAM) can be used to hide access patterns but ORAM might be excessive as in some settings it could be sufficient to be compatible with differential privacy and only protect the privacy of individual accesses. We consider (epsilon, delta)-Differentially Private RAM, a weakening of ORAM that only protects individual operations and seems better suited for use in data analysis on outsourced databases. As differentially private RAM has weaker security than ORAM, there is hope that we can bypass the O(log(nb/c)) bandwidth lower bounds for ORAM by Larsen and Nielsen [CRYPTO'18] for storing an array of n b-bit entries and a client with c bits of memory. We answer in the negative and present an Omega(log(nb/c)) bandwidth lower bound for privacy budgets of epsilon = O(1) and delta <= 1/3. The information transfer technique used for ORAM lower bounds does not seem adaptable for use with the weaker security guarantees of differential privacy. Instead, we prove our lower bounds by adapting the chronogram technique to our setting. To our knowledge, this is the first work that uses the chronogram technique for lower bounds on privacy-preserving storage primitives.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 434
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tight Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Selection
    Steinke, Thomas
    Ullman, Jonathan
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 58TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS), 2017, : 552 - 563
  • [2] Lower Bounds for RAMs and Quantifier Elimination
    Ajtai, Miklos
    [J]. STOC'13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2013, : 803 - 812
  • [3] Lower Bounds on the Error of Query Sets Under the Differentially-Private Matrix Mechanism
    Chao Li
    Gerome Miklau
    [J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 2015, 57 : 1159 - 1201
  • [4] Lower Bounds on the Error of Query Sets Under the Differentially-Private Matrix Mechanism
    Li, Chao
    Miklau, Gerome
    [J]. THEORY OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2015, 57 (04) : 1159 - 1201
  • [5] Lower Bounds for Multi-server Oblivious RAMs
    Larsen, Kasper Green
    Simkin, Mark
    Yeo, Kevin
    [J]. THEORY OF CRYPTOGRAPHY, TCC 2020, PT I, 2020, 12550 : 486 - 503
  • [6] Lower Bounds for Dynamic Data Structures on Algebraic RAMs
    [J]. Algorithmica, 2002, 32 : 364 - 395
  • [7] Lower bounds for dynamic data structures on algebraic RAMs
    Ben-Amram, AM
    Galil, Z
    [J]. ALGORITHMICA, 2002, 32 (03) : 364 - 395
  • [8] Sharper Utility Bounds for Differentially Private Models
    Kang, Yilin
    Liu, Yong
    Li, Jian
    Wang, Weiping
    [J]. arXiv, 2022,
  • [9] Tight Bounds for Differentially Private Anonymized Histograms
    Manurangsi, Pasin
    [J]. 2022 SYMPOSIUM ON SIMPLICITY IN ALGORITHMS, SOSA, 2022, : 203 - 213
  • [10] Nearly Tight Bounds For Differentially Private Multiway Cut
    Dalirrooyfard, Mina
    Mitrovic, Slobodan
    Nevmyvaka, Yuriy
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,