Tight Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Selection

被引:25
|
作者
Steinke, Thomas [1 ]
Ullman, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] IBM Res Almaden, San Jose, CA 95120 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, CCIS, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Differential Privacy; Selection; Fingerprinting; Multiple Hypothesis Testing; Top-k Problem;
D O I
10.1109/FOCS.2017.57
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A pervasive task in the differential privacy literature is to select the k items of "highest quality" out of a set of d items, where the quality of each item depends on a sensitive dataset that must be protected. Variants of this task arise naturally in fundamental problems like feature selection and hypothesis testing, and also as subroutines for many sophisticated differentially private algorithms. The standard approaches to these tasks-repeated use of the exponential mechanism or the sparse vector technique-approximately solve this problem given a dataset of n = O(root k log d) samples. We provide a tight lower bound for some very simple variants of the private selection problem. Our lower bound shows that a sample of size n = O(root k log d) is required even to achieve a very minimal accuracy guarantee. Our results are based on an extension of the fingerprinting method to sparse selection problems. Previously, the fingerprinting method has been used to provide tight lower bounds for answering an entire set of d queries, but often only some much smaller set of k queries are relevant. Our extension allows us to prove lower bounds that depend on both the number of relevant queries and the total number of queries.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 563
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tight Bounds for Differentially Private Anonymized Histograms
    Manurangsi, Pasin
    [J]. 2022 SYMPOSIUM ON SIMPLICITY IN ALGORITHMS, SOSA, 2022, : 203 - 213
  • [2] Lower Bounds for Differentially Private RAMs
    Persiano, Giuseppe
    Yeo, Kevin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CRYPTOLOGY - EUROCRYPT 2019, PT I, 2019, 11476 : 404 - 434
  • [3] Nearly Tight Bounds For Differentially Private Multiway Cut
    Dalirrooyfard, Mina
    Mitrovic, Slobodan
    Nevmyvaka, Yuriy
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [4] Tight Lower Bounds for Selection in Randomly Ordered Streams
    Chakrabarti, Amit
    Jayram, T. S.
    Patrascu, Mihai
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2008, : 720 - +
  • [5] TIGHT LOWER BOUNDS FOR SHELLSORT
    WEISS, MA
    SEDGEWICK, R
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1988, 318 : 255 - 262
  • [6] TIGHT LOWER BOUNDS FOR SHELLSORT
    WEISS, MA
    SEDGEWICK, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS, 1990, 11 (02) : 242 - 251
  • [7] Tight Bounds for Distributed Selection
    Kuhn, Fabian
    Locher, Thomas
    Wattenhofer, Roger
    [J]. SPAA'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLELISM IN ALGORITHMS AND ARCHITECTURES, 2007, : 145 - +
  • [8] Lower Bounds on the Error of Query Sets Under the Differentially-Private Matrix Mechanism
    Chao Li
    Gerome Miklau
    [J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 2015, 57 : 1159 - 1201
  • [9] Lower Bounds on the Error of Query Sets Under the Differentially-Private Matrix Mechanism
    Li, Chao
    Miklau, Gerome
    [J]. THEORY OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2015, 57 (04) : 1159 - 1201
  • [10] Tight Double Exponential Lower Bounds
    Bliznets, Ivan
    Hecher, Markus
    [J]. THEORY AND APPLICATIONS OF MODELS OF COMPUTATION, TAMC 2024, 2024, 14637 : 124 - 136