Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma

被引:8
|
作者
Ebata, Takahiro [1 ]
Yonemori, Kan [1 ]
Nishikawa, Tadaaki [1 ,3 ]
Sudo, Kazuki [1 ]
Shimomura, Akihiko [1 ]
Noguchi, Emi [1 ]
Fujiwara, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Kato, Tomoyasu [2 ]
Hasegawa, Kosei [3 ]
Fujiwara, Keiichi [3 ]
Tamura, Kenji [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Breast & Med Oncol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Int Med Ctr, Hidaka City, Japan
关键词
Carcinosarcoma; Chemotherapy; Second-line chemotherapy; Treatment-free interval; PHASE-II EVALUATION; STAGE UTERINE CARCINOSARCOMA; RECURRENT; SURVIVAL; PLATINUM; UTERUS; IMPACT; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1159/000507333
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction:Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.Objective:To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.Methods:We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.Results:Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p= 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.Conclusion:The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 705
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of second-line chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer
    Bridgewater, John
    Palmer, Daniel
    Cunningham, David
    Iveson, Tim
    Gillmore, Roopinder
    Waters, Justin
    Harrison, Mark
    Wasan, Harpreet
    Corrie, Pippa
    Valle, Juan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (06) : 1511 - 1511
  • [2] Outcome of Second-Line Treatment After First-Line Chemotherapy With the GONO FOLFOXIRI Regimen
    Fornaro, Lorenzo
    Vasile, Enrico
    Masi, Gianluca
    Loupakis, Fotios
    Baldi, Giacomo Giulio
    Allegrini, Giacomo
    Salvatore, Lisa
    Cremolini, Chiara
    Cupini, Samanta
    Cortesi, Enrico
    Tuzi, Alessandro
    Granetto, Cristina
    Brunetti, Isa Maura
    Ricci, Sergio
    Falcone, Alfredo
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2012, 11 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [3] A phase II evaluation of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel for second-line treatment of recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: A gynecologic oncology group study
    Miller, Brigitte E.
    Blessing, John A.
    Stehman, Frederick B.
    Shahin, Mark S.
    Yamada, S. Diane
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Warshal, David P.
    Abulafia, Ovadia
    Richards, William E.
    Van Le, Linda
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 118 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [4] Rituximab is preferable to chemotherapy as second-line treatment for PTLD
    Williams R.
    Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2006, 2 (5): : 237 - 238
  • [5] Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Lincoln, S
    Blessing, JA
    Lee, RB
    Rocereto, TF
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) : 277 - 281
  • [6] Second-line chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer: Outcome and prognostic factors
    Schweitzer, Nora
    Kirstein, Martha M.
    Kratzel, Anna-Maria
    Mederacke, Young-Seon
    Fischer, Mareike
    Manns, Michael P.
    Vogel, Arndt
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (05) : 914 - 923
  • [7] Response to letter 'Outcome of second-line chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer'
    Walter, Thomas
    Horgan, Anne M.
    McNamara, Mairead
    McKeeve, Liz
    Min, Trisha
    Hedley, David
    Serra, Stefano
    Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
    Chen, Eric
    Mackay, Helen
    Feld, Ronald
    Moore, Malcolm
    Knox, Jennifer J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (06) : 1512 - 1513
  • [8] Not only chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer
    Vasile, E.
    Caparello, C.
    Caponi, S.
    Ginocchi, L.
    Vivaldi, C.
    Musettini, G.
    Lucchesi, M.
    Lencioni, M.
    Falcone, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (02) : 544 - 545
  • [9] The role of surgery in addition to chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of glioblastomas
    Mendes, A. S.
    Pereira, H.
    Liu, P. C.
    Miranda, H. M.
    Romao, R. M.
    Noronha, C.
    Rocha, L.
    Pinheiro, C.
    Rosendo, E. M.
    Freitas Magalhaes, M. J.
    Moreira, R.
    Pereira Amorim, M. J.
    Sousa, M.
    Malheiro Sarmento, T.
    Ferreira Araujo, A. M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S677 - S677
  • [10] Treatment Choices for Second-Line Chemotherapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Christoph C. Zielinski
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2003, 81 (Suppl 1) : 33 - 36