SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEMS AS A SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVE TO ANIMAL PRODUCTION IN THE TROPICS

被引:0
|
作者
Mauricio, R. M. [1 ]
Sousa, L. F. [1 ]
Moreira, G. R. [1 ]
Reis, G. L. [1 ]
Goncalves, L. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica, BR-30510010 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
trees; forages; bovine; environment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The increasing number of cattle in Brazil indicates their economically positive benefit however, they are also one of the major causes of environmental degradation. In Brazil, deforested areas are mainly used for pastures and while these are very productive initially, have generally degraded within a five year period. These poor quality pastures generate low, uneconomic levels of milk and beef production, with the resulting poverty causing rural populations to increasingly migrate to urban areas. Therefore, to reduce the negative impacts of livestock on the environment and communities, sustainable alternative animal production techniques have need to be developed and adopted. The silvopastoral systems (SPS) which encompass agriculture (legumes, grasses, trees etc.) and livestock (principally cattle and sheep) have demonstrated that it is possible to combine animal production, environmental conservation and social benefits. The trees in the SPS enhance nutrient uptake from the soil, which is then passed to the grass through the degradation of organic matter (e.g. leaf loss) so improving both soil fertility and forage quality. The trees also enhance animal welfare due to the lower shade temperatures and increased humidity, can be a source of wood (timber and fuel), bio-diesel, as well as improving environmental aspect e.g. aesthetics, reducing soil erosion and water loss and increasing bio-diversity. The results of the research are contradictory and specific for each SPS evaluated as they vary according to the grass and tree species used, the weather and soil conditions and the management applied. Several experiments have shown lower forage production under the trees, even though protein content was improved and therefore of a better nutritional quality for animal production. However, only in few studies under tropical conditions were environmental and social aspects evaluated directly. In order to apply the concept of sustainable agriculture and livestock production developed by the Food Agriculture Organization (FAO), it is necessary to expand the narrow view taken so far by research. To achieve this production has to evaluated, not through one particular aspect, but from a more holistic point of view in which the economic, social and environmental results are integrated.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 199
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SUSTAINABLE PASTURE SYSTEMS IN THE HUMID TROPICS OF QUEENSLAND
    TEITZEL, JK
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 1992, 26 (03): : 196 - 205
  • [22] Silvopastoral system as a climate-smart alternative for beef production: Enteric methane emission neutralization and animal thermal comfort increase
    Brunetti, Henrique B.
    Oliveira, Patricia P. A.
    Pezzopane, Jose R. M.
    Bernardi, Alberto C. de C.
    Garcia, Alexandre R.
    Berndt, Alexandre
    Pedroso, Andrede F.
    Lelis, Ana L. J.
    Medeiros, Sergio R.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2025, 225
  • [23] Response of forage production to drought in silvopastoral systems in Argentina
    Peri, Pablo L.
    Toledo, Santiago
    Gandara, Luis
    Trinco, Fabio
    Atanasio, Marcos A.
    Calamari, Noelia C.
    Casaubon, Edgardo
    Martinez, Natalia
    Ledesma, Roxana
    Gomez, Federico
    Lara, Javier
    Blanco, Lisandro
    Carranza, Carlos
    Von Mueller, Axel
    Varela, Santiago
    Rossner, Belen
    Lezana, Lucrecia
    Lencinas, Maria V.
    Tarabini, Manuela
    Maidana, Emilio
    Pernochi, Lorena
    Canavelli, Sonia B.
    Banegas, Natalia
    Lertora, Raul
    Eclesia, Roxana P.
    Cuerda, Florencia
    Ledesma, Marcela
    Umana, Fernando
    Benitez, Julieta
    Caballero, Enzo
    Colcombet, Luis
    Barzan, Flavia R.
    Pastur, Guillermo Martinez
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2024, 98 (07) : 2109 - 2123
  • [24] Wood production and financial return in two silvopastoral systems
    Boscana, M.
    Bussoni, A.
    Bentancur, O.
    AGROCIENCIA URUGUAY, 2023, 27
  • [25] Grassland for sustainable animal production
    Laidlaw, A. S.
    Sebek, L. B. J.
    GRASSLAND - A EUROPEAN RESOURCE?, 2012, 17 : 47 - 58
  • [26] Animal production and sustainable agriculture
    Letson, D
    Setia, P
    Hyberg, B
    Baumes, H
    Purvis, A
    Glover, T
    Cochran, M
    Roka, F
    Ford, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 77 (05) : 1356 - 1356
  • [27] Special Issue: Assessment for Sustainable Development of Animal Production Systems Preface
    Van der Zijpp, Akke J.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2011, 139 (1-2) : 1 - 2
  • [28] Animal production in a sustainable agriculture
    Hellstrand S.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15 (4) : 999 - 1036
  • [29] Improving animal production and health in the tropics—the challenge of humankind
    André M. de Almeida
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2018, 50 : 1177 - 1179
  • [30] Animal thermal comfort indexes in silvopastoral systems with different tree arrangements
    Macedo Pezzopane, Jose Ricardo
    Franceschi Nicodemo, Maria Luiza
    Bosi, Cristiam
    Garcia, Alexandre Rossetto
    Lulu, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 79 : 103 - 111