Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and CLSI M100S 26th Edition Breakpoints

被引:37
|
作者
Bobenchik, April M. [1 ,3 ]
Deak, Eszter [1 ,3 ]
Hindler, Janet A. [2 ]
Charlton, Carmen L. [1 ,3 ]
Humphries, Romney M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] UCLA Hlth Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Lifespan Acad Med Ctr, Providence, RI USA
关键词
Acinetobacter baumannii; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Vitek; 2; breakpoints; broth microdilution; BETA-LACTAM SUSCEPTIBILITY; SYSTEMS BD PHOENIX; AUTOMATED-SYSTEMS; MICROSCAN WALKAWAY; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01859-16
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The performances of Vitek 2 AST-GN69 and AST-XN06 cards were compared to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) for 99 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 26 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, and 11 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates. In total, 15 antimicrobials were evaluated, with 11 for P. aeruginosa, 14 for A. baumannii, and 2 for S. maltophilia. Categorical agreement (CA) was assessed using both Vitek 2 breakpoints and 2016 CLSI M100S 26th edition breakpoints. The essential agreement values for P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia were 99.5%, 99.2%, and 100%, respectively. The CA values for P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. maltophilia were 94.1%, 92.7%, and 95.5%, respectively, by the Vitek 2 breakpoints, and 93.4%, 92.3%, and 95.5%, respectively, by the CLSI breakpoints. Overall, the Vitek 2 performance was comparable to that of BMD using both Vitek 2 breakpoints and 2016 CLSI M100S 26th edition breakpoints. Improved performance was noted for the reformulated piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem found on the AST-GN69 card, with no very major or major errors noted when using the CLSI breakpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 456
页数:7
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and 2014 CLSI Breakpoints
    Bobenchik, April M.
    Deak, Eszter
    Hindler, Janet A.
    Charlton, Carmen L.
    Humphries, Romney M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (03) : 816 - 823
  • [2] Evaluation of Vitek2 and BD Phoenix in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Jekarl, Dong Wook
    Han, Sang Bong
    Kim, Yoon Joo
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Park, Jung Jun
    Han, Kyungja
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 67 (04) : 384 - 386
  • [3] Performance of Vitek 2 in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with different mechanisms of β-lactam resistance
    Mazzariol, Annarita
    Aldegheri, Marco
    Ligozzi, Marco
    Lo Cascio, Giuliana
    Koncan, Raffaella
    Fontana, Roberta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (06) : 2095 - 2098