Performance of Vitek 2 in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with different mechanisms of β-lactam resistance

被引:10
|
作者
Mazzariol, Annarita [1 ]
Aldegheri, Marco [1 ]
Ligozzi, Marco [1 ]
Lo Cascio, Giuliana [2 ]
Koncan, Raffaella [1 ]
Fontana, Roberta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Clin Microbiol Lab, Dipartimento Patol, Sez Microbiol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Azienda Osped, Serv Microbiol Immunol & Virol, Verona, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02216-07
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A total of 78 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grouped according to the phenotype for ceftazidime and imipenem susceptibility/resistance were used to assess the accuracy of the Vitek 2 system in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comparisons were made with a MIC gradient test for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. For the total of 546 isolate-antimicrobial combinations tested, the category agreement was 83.6%, with 2.0, 1.6, and 12.8% very major, major, and minor errors, respectively. Vitek 2 accuracy was influenced differently by the mechanism responsible for resistance, and interpretation of the results in relation to phenotype could improve the performance of the system.
引用
收藏
页码:2095 / 2098
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of β-lactam susceptibility testing results from VITEK and VITEK 2 systems when testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    LaBombardi, V.
    Rekasius, V.
    Schreckenberger, P.
    Jones, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 29 : S460 - S460
  • [2] Performance Evaluation of VITEK 2 System in Meropenem Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates
    Acuner, Ibrahim Cagatay
    Bayramoglu, Gulcin
    Birinci, Asuman
    Cihan, Cigdem Cekic
    Bek, Yuksel
    Durupinar, Belma
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 411 - 421
  • [3] Automated (Vitek 2) versus disk diffusion for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pseudomonas aeruginosa against beta lactam antibiotics
    Goldman, J.
    Selvarangan, R.
    Jackson, M. A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (04) : 454 - 454
  • [4] Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype 011 isolates to aminoglycoside and beta-lactam antibiotics and mechanisms of resistance
    Kallova, J
    Bujdakova, H
    Macickova, T
    Hletkova, M
    Milosovic, P
    Kettner, M
    [J]. BIOLOGIA, 1996, 51 (03): : 237 - 242
  • [5] Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods
    Rantakokko-Jalava, K
    Elo-Lehtonen, E
    Meurman, O
    [J]. APMIS, 2006, 114 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [6] Evaluation of Vitek2 and BD Phoenix in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Jekarl, Dong Wook
    Han, Sang Bong
    Kim, Yoon Joo
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Park, Jung Jun
    Han, Kyungja
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 67 (04) : 384 - 386
  • [7] MECHANISMS OF BETA-LACTAM RESISTANCE IN BRITISH ISOLATES OF PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA
    WILLIAMS, RJ
    LIVERMORE, DM
    LINDRIDGE, MA
    SAID, AA
    WILLIAMS, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 17 (03) : 283 - 293
  • [8] Susceptibility testing of pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Vitek 2 system: A comparison with Etest results
    Saegeman, V
    Huynen, P
    Colaert, J
    Melin, P
    Verhaegen, J
    [J]. ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2005, 60 (01): : 3 - 9
  • [9] Mechanisms of β-lactam Resistance Among Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Wolter, Daniel J.
    Lister, Philip D.
    [J]. CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2013, 19 (02) : 209 - 222
  • [10] Ability of the VITEK 2 advanced expert system to identify β-lactam phenotypes in isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Sanders, CC
    Peyret, M
    Moland, ES
    Shubert, C
    Thomson, KS
    Boeufgras, JM
    Sanders, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (02) : 570 - 574