A Study of Amplicor Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance-Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study

被引:16
|
作者
Wentzensen, Nicolas [1 ]
Gravitt, Patti E. [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Diane [2 ]
Wheeler, Cosette M. [5 ,6 ]
Castle, Philip E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Rockville, MD 20854 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Rockville, MD 20854 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mol Microbiol & Immunol, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Mol Genet & Microbiol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
HYBRID CAPTURE 2; ABNORMAL PAP-SMEAR; CERVICAL-CANCER; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CYTOLOGY INTERPRETATIONS; HYBRID-CAPTURE-2; ASSAY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SCREENING-TESTS; ROCHE AMPLICOR; HPV GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1180
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We analyzed the performance of Amplicor for detecting carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and cervical precancer in women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) Pap and compared the results with Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) in the ASCUS and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) triage study (ALTS). Baseline specimens collected from women referred into ALTS based on an ASCUS Pap result were prospectively tested by hc2 and retrospectively tested by Amplicor (n = 3,277). Following receiver-operator-characteristics curve analysis, Amplicor performance was analyzed at three cutoffs (0.2, 1.0, and 1.5). Paired Amplicor and hc2 results were compared for the detection of 2-year cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 and more severe disease outcomes (CIN3+) and for the detection of 13 targeted carcinogenic HPV types. Amplicor at the 0.2 cutoff had a higher sensitivity for the detection of CIN3+ (95.8% versus 92.6%, P = 0.01) but a much lower specificity (38.9% versus 50.6%, P < 0.001) than hc2. Amplicor at the 1.5 cutoff had an identical sensitivity for the detection of CIN3+ (92.6%) and a slightly lower specificity (47.5%; P < 0.001). The positive predictive value of hc2 was higher at all Amplicor cutoffs, whereas referral rates were significantly lower (53.2% for hc2 versus 64.1% at the 0.2 cutoff and 56.0% at the 1.5 cutoff, P < 0.001). Amplicor was more analytically specific for detecting targeted carcinogenic HPV types than hc2. Amplicor at the 1.5 cutoff had comparable performance with hc2. Whereas Amplicor missed more disease related to nontargeted types, hc2 was more likely to miss disease related to targeted types. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(5):1341-9)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1341 / 1349
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: Colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation
    Lonky, NM
    Felix, JC
    Naidu, YM
    Wolde-Tsadik, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (03): : 481 - 489
  • [42] Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance cytology: A prospective study
    Wensveen, C
    Kagie, M
    Veldhuizen, R
    De Groot, C
    Denny, L
    Zwinderman, K
    Trimbos, B
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (09) : 883 - 889
  • [43] Cumulative High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Rate and Need for Surgical Intervention of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Cytology-Diagnosed Patients: A Prospective Study
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Kalogiannidis, Ioannis
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Mavromatidis, George
    Prapas, Nikolaos
    Rousso, David
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2017, 82 (03) : 247 - 251
  • [44] High Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection in Pap Tests with Both Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance and Candida
    Hall, Jordan
    Kendall, Bryan
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2009, 53 (02) : 150 - 152
  • [45] ASCCP Risk-Based Colposcopy Recommendations Applied in Thai Women With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance or Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Cytology
    Phianpiset, Rattiya
    Ruengkhachorn, Irene
    Jareemit, Nida
    Ittiamornlert, Pornprom
    Chaopotong, Pattama
    Hanamornroongruang, Suchanan
    Horthongkham, Navin
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03): : 510 - 517
  • [46] Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions
    Cuzick, Jack
    Cox, J. Thomas
    Zhang, Guili
    Einstein, Mark H.
    Stoler, Mark
    Trupin, Suzanne
    Behrens, Catherine M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 132 (04) : 959 - 966
  • [47] Systematic review of economic evaluations of triage tests for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL)
    Meirelles, Isandra
    Pinto, Márcia
    Barros, Leticia
    Russomano, Fabio
    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2024, 40 (01)
  • [48] Value of P16 expression in the triage of liquid-based cervical cytology with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions
    Ma Yuan-ying
    Cheng Xiao-dong
    Zhou Cai-yun
    Qiu Li-qian
    Chen Xiao-duan
    Lu Wei-guo
    Xie Xing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 124 (16) : 2443 - 2447
  • [49] Value of P16 expression in the triage of liquid-based cervical cytology with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions
    MA Yuanying
    CHENG Xiaodong
    ZHOU Caiyun
    QIU Liqian
    CHEN Xiaoduan
    L Weiguo
    XIE Xing
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2011, (16) : 2443 - 2447
  • [50] Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category' Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?
    Cetiner, Handan
    Kir, Gozde
    Kaygusuz, Ecmel
    Saglican, Yesim
    Kabaca, Canan
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2013, 57 (06) : 581 - 584