Comparative pathogenicity of sexual and asexual spores of Zymoseptoria tritici (septoria tritici blotch) on wheat leaves

被引:10
|
作者
Morais, D. [1 ]
Laval, V. [1 ]
Sache, I. [2 ]
Suffert, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, BIOGER UMR1290, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[2] AgroParisTech, BIOGER UMR1290, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
关键词
ascospore; Gompertz function; latent period; Mycosphaerella graminicola; pycnidiospore; wheat; RAPE BRASSICA-NAPUS; LIGHT LEAF-SPOT; MYCOSPHAERELLA-GRAMINICOLA; WINTER-WHEAT; PYRENOPEZIZA-BRASSICAE; LATENT PERIOD; PARTIAL RESISTANCE; AIRBORNE INOCULUM; EPIDEMICS; ASCOSPORES;
D O I
10.1111/ppa.12372
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Zymoseptoria tritici ascospores and pycnidiospores are considered the main forms of primary and secondary inoculum, respectively, in septoria tritici blotch epidemics. The pathogenicity of the two types of spores of the same genotypic origin were compared through a two-stage inoculation procedure in controlled conditions. Adult wheat leaves were inoculated with ascospores collected from field sources, yielding 119 lesions; pycnidiospores collected from 12 lesions resulting from these ascospore infections were then used for inoculation. Lesion development was assessed for 5 weeks; latent period, lesion size, and pycnidium density were estimated for different isolates. The latent period was calculated as the maximum likely time elapsed between inoculation and either the appearance of the majority of the sporulating lesions (leaf scale) or the appearance of the first pycnidia (lesion scale). The latent period was significantly longer (c. 60 degree-days, i.e. 3-4 days) after infection with ascospores than with pycnidiospores. No difference was established for lesion size and density of pycnidia. A comparison with other ascomycete fungi suggested that the difference in latent period might be related to the volume of spores and their ability to cause infection. Fungal growth before the appearance of lesions may be slower after inoculation with an ascospore than with a pycnidiospore. The mean latent period during the very beginning of epidemics, when first lesions are mainly caused by ascospores, may be longer than during spring, when secondary infections are caused by pycnidiospores. Disease models would be improved if these differences were considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1439
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hyperspectral Canopy Sensing of Wheat Septoria Tritici Blotch Disease
    Yu, Kang
    Anderegg, Jonas
    Mikaberidze, Alexey
    Karisto, Petteri
    Mascher, Fabio
    McDonald, Bruce A.
    Walter, Achim
    Hund, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [42] Intensity of Septoria tritici blotch in 1995
    Zamorski, C
    Nowicki, B
    PLANT DISEASES AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1996, : 233 - 237
  • [43] OCCURRENCE OF SEPTORIA-NODORUM BLOTCH AND SEPTORIA-TRITICI BLOTCH IN MICHIGAN WINTER-WHEAT
    HART, LP
    FULBRIGHT, DW
    CLAYTON, JL
    RAVENSCROFT, AV
    PLANT DISEASE, 1984, 68 (05) : 418 - 420
  • [44] The identification of a transposon affecting the asexual reproduction of the wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici
    Wang, Chen
    Milgate, Andrew W.
    Solomon, Peter S.
    McDonald, Megan C.
    MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) : 800 - 816
  • [45] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH GLOBAL OCCURRENCES OF SEPTORIA-NODORUM BLOTCH AND SEPTORIA-TRITICI BLOTCH OF WHEAT
    LEATH, S
    SCHAREN, AL
    DIETZHOLMES, ME
    LUND, RE
    PLANT DISEASE, 1993, 77 (12) : 1266 - 1270
  • [46] Detection of virulence to septoria tritici blotch (STB) resistance conferred by the winter wheat cultivar Cougar in the Irish Zymoseptoria tritici population and potential implications for STB control
    Kildea, Steven
    Sheppard, Liam
    Cucak, Mladen
    Hutton, Fiona
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2021, 70 (09) : 2137 - 2147
  • [47] Repeatability of Assays for Seedling Septoria Tritici Blotch Resistance in Winter Wheat
    X. Zhang
    S. D. Haley
    Y. Jin
    Cereal Research Communications, 2002, 30 : 157 - 163
  • [48] Heading date and resistance to septoria tritici blotch in wheat not genetically associated
    Arama, PF
    Parlevliet, JE
    van Silfhout, CH
    EUPHYTICA, 1999, 106 (01) : 63 - 68
  • [49] EVALUATION OF WHEAT WILD RELATIVES FOR RESISTANCE TO SEPTORIA-TRITICI BLOTCH
    MCKENDRY, AL
    HENKE, GE
    CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (04) : 1080 - 1084
  • [50] MODEL FOR PREDICTING SEVERITY OF SEPTORIA TRITICI BLOTCH ON WINTER-WHEAT
    COAKLEY, SM
    MCDANIEL, LR
    SHANER, G
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1985, 75 (11) : 1245 - 1251