Costs of on-demand and prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden

被引:38
|
作者
Carlsson, KS
Höjgård, S
Lindgren, A
Lethagen, S
Schulman, S
Glomstein, A
Tengborn, L
Berntorp, E
Lindgren, B
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, SE-22007 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Community Med, SE-22007 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Inst Technol, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Coagulat Disorders, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Haematol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Inst Rare Daignoses, Oslo, Norway
[7] Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med Cardiol & Vasc Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
cost; longitudinal data analysis; on-demand; prophylaxis; sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00952.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The expected annual cost (in the year 2000 prices) for a 30-year-old patient with average individual and treatment characteristics for on-demand EUR 51 832 (95% CI: 44 324-59 341) and for prophylaxis EUR 146 118 (95% CI: 129 965-162 271), was obtained from panel-data analysis of an 11-year retrospective panel of 156 patients with severe haemophilia in Norway and Sweden. Costs included haemophilia-related treatment costs within the health-care sector (factor concentrate, doctors' visits, diagnostic procedures, hospitalisation, invasive procedures, etc.) and cost for haemophilia-related resource use in other sectors (lost production, use of special equipment, adaptation of workplace and domicile, etc). Although costs of lost production, reconstructive surgery and hospitalisation were higher for on-demand, they did not balance out the higher costs of factor-concentrate consumption in prophylaxis. The cut-off risk of premature death, where on-demand and prophylaxis would have been equally costly, was 3.7 percentage units higher for on-demand than for prophylaxis. Such a great risk difference has not been reported elsewhere to our knowledge. Estimated cost-elasticities indicated that annual costs of prophylaxis would increase by approximately the same proportion as a potential increase in the price of factor concentrate and decrease less than proportionately with a reduction in prescribed dose kg(-1). For on-demand, the annual costs would increase by approximately the same proportion as an increase in the prescribed dose kg(-1).
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 526
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementation of on-demand treatment protocol in adult patients with severe haemophilia by an emerging program for comprehensive care of haemophilia: preliminary results
    Zuniga, P.
    Morales, J.
    Reyes, L.
    Gonzalez, X.
    Querol, F.
    Aznar, J.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2008, 14 : 138 - 138
  • [22] Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is superior to on-demand therapy in a standardized model of severe necrotizing pancreatitis
    Fritz, S.
    Hartwig, W.
    Lehmann, R.
    Hackett, T.
    Geiss, H.
    Will-Schweiger, K.
    Buechler, M. W.
    Werner, J.
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2006, 33 (04) : 461 - 461
  • [23] Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus treatment on-demand for individuals with severe haemophilia
    Miners, AH
    Sabin, CA
    Tolley, KH
    Lee, CA
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2002, 20 (11) : 759 - 774
  • [24] Cost-Utility Analysis of Primary Prophylaxis versus Treatment On-Demand for Individuals with Severe Haemophilia
    Alexander H. Miners
    Caroline A. Sabin
    Keith H. Tolley
    Christine A. Lee
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2002, 20 : 759 - 774
  • [25] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PROPHYLAXIS COMPARED TO ON-DEMAND TREATMENT IN SEVERE HAEMOPHILIA A. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Odnoletkova, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A599 - A600
  • [26] Consequences of switching from prophylactic treatment to on-demand treatment in late teens and early adults with severe hemophilia A
    Manco-Johnson, M. J.
    Sanders, J.
    Ewing, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2011, 9 : 468 - 468
  • [27] Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A. A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment
    Farrugia, A.
    Bansal, M.
    Cassar, J.
    Kimber, M. C.
    Auserswald, G.
    Fischer, K.
    O'Mahony, B.
    Noone, D.
    Tolley, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 11 : 353 - 354
  • [28] Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A- A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment
    Farrugia, A.
    Cassar, J.
    Kimber, M. C.
    Bansal, M.
    Fischer, K.
    Auserswald, G.
    O'Mahony, B.
    Tolley, K.
    Noone, D.
    Balboni, S.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2013, 19 (04) : e228 - e238
  • [29] Patient-reported outcomes of 182 adults with severe haemophilia in Germany comparing prophylactic vs. on-demand replacement therapy
    Mondorf, W.
    Kalnins, W.
    Klamroth, R.
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2013, 19 (04) : 558 - 563
  • [30] Once-Weekly Prophylactic Treatment Versus on-Demand Treatment of Nonacog Alfa in Patients with Moderately Severe to Severe Hemophilia B
    Kavakli, Kaan
    Smith, Lynne
    Kuliczkowski, Kazimierz
    Korth-Bradley, Joan
    You, Chur Woo
    Fuiman, Joanne
    Zupancic-Salek, Silva
    Karim, Faraizah Abdul
    Rendo, Pablo
    [J]. BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)