Improved Parsing for Arabic by Combining Diverse Dependency Parsers

被引:3
|
作者
Alabbas, Maytham [2 ]
Ramsay, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Comp Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Basrah Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Basrah, Iraq
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Dependency parsing; MSTParser; MALTParser; System combination;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_4
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recently there has been a considerable interest in dependency parsing for many reasons. First, it works accurately for a wide range of typologically different languages. Second, it can be useful for semantics, since it can be easier to attach compositional rules directly to lexical items than to assign them to large numbers of phrase structure rules. Third, robust machine-learning based parsers are available. In this paper, we investigate two techniques for combining multiple data-driven dependency parsers for parsing Arabic, where we are faced with an exceptional level of lexical and structural ambiguity. Experimental results show that combined parsers can produce more accurate results, even for imperfectly tagged text, than each parser produces by itself for texts with the gold-standard tags.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inductive dependency parsing
    Samuelsson, Christer
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 2007, 33 (02) : 267 - 269
  • [32] Croatian Dependency Treebank 2.0: New Annotation Guidelines for Improved Parsing
    Agic, Zeljko
    Berovic, Dasa
    Merkler, Danijela
    Tadic, Marko
    [J]. LREC 2014 - NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2014, : 2313 - 2319
  • [33] DEPENDENCY PARSING OF POLISH
    Wroblewska, Alina
    Rybak, Piotr
    [J]. POZNAN STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY LINGUISTICS, 2019, 55 (02): : 305 - 337
  • [34] Latent Tree Learning with Differentiable Parsers: Shift-Reduce Parsing and Chart Parsing
    Maillard, Jean
    Clark, Stephen
    [J]. RELEVANCE OF LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE IN NEURAL ARCHITECTURES FOR NLP, 2018, : 13 - 18
  • [35] PARSING DEPENDENCY GRAMMARS
    LOMBARDO, V
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1991, 549 : 291 - 300
  • [36] On different LL and LR parsers used in LLLR parsing
    Slivnik, Bostjan
    [J]. COMPUTER LANGUAGES SYSTEMS & STRUCTURES, 2017, 50 : 108 - 126
  • [37] Efficient Third-order Dependency Parsers
    Koo, Terry
    Collins, Michael
    [J]. ACL 2010: 48TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, 2010, : 1 - 11
  • [38] Dependency and phrasal parsers of the Czech language:: A comparison
    Horak, Ales
    Holan, Tomas
    Kadlec, Vladimir
    Kovar, Vojtech
    [J]. TEXT, SPEECH AND DIALOGUE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4629 : 76 - +
  • [39] Dependency Graphs and TEITOK: Exploiting Dependency Parsing
    Janssen, Maarten
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL PROCESSING OF THE PORTUGUESE LANGUAGE, PROPOR 2018, 2018, 11122 : 470 - 478
  • [40] Revisiting Tri-training of Dependency Parsers
    Wagner, Joachim
    Foster, Jennifer
    [J]. 2021 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP 2021), 2021, : 9457 - 9473