Spatial regularization in subspace learning for face recognition: implicit vs. explicit

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Yulian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Songcan [2 ]
Tian, Qing [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Ctr Comp, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Face recognition; Implicit spatial regularization (ISR); Explicit spatial regularization (ESR); Subspace learning; Linear discriminant analysis (LDA); Locality preserving projection (LPP); 3-D OBJECT RETRIEVAL; SMOOTH SUBSPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.028
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In applying traditional statistical method to face recognition, each original face image is often vectorized as a vector. But such a vectorization not only leads to high-dimensionality, thus small sample size (SSS) problem, but also loses the original spatial relationship between image pixels. It has been proved that spatial regularization (SR) is an effective means to compensate the loss of such relationship and at the same time, and mitigate SSS problem by explicitly imposing spatial constraints. However, SR still suffers from two main problems: one is high computational cost due to high dimensionality and the other is the selection of the key regularization factors controlling the spatial regularization and thus learning performance. Accordingly, in this paper, we provide a new idea, coined as implicit spatial regularization (ISR), to avoid losing the spatial relationship between image pixels and deal with SSS problem simultaneously for face recognition. Different from explicit spatial regularization (ESR), which introduces directly spatial regularization term and is based on vector representation, the proposed ISR constrains spatial smoothness within each small image region by reshaping image and then executing 2D-based feature extraction methods. Specifically, we follow the same assumption as made in SSSL (a typical ESR method) that a small image region around an image pixel is smooth, and reshape each original image into a new matrix whose each column corresponds to a vectorized small image region, and then we extract features from the newly-formed matrix using any off-the-shelf 2D-based method which can take the relationship between pixels in the same row or column into account, such that the original spatial relationship within the neighboring region can be greatly retained. Since ISR does not impose constraint items, compared with ESR, ISR not only avoids the selection of the troublesome regularization parameter, but also greatly reduces computational cost. Experimental results on four face databases show that the proposed ISR can achieve competitive performance as SSSL but with lower computational cost. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1554 / 1564
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implicit vs. Explicit Learning in Pursuit Tracking
    Sekiya, H.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S105 - S105
  • [2] Implicit vs. Explicit Learning of Pursuit Tracking Patterns
    Magill, R. A.
    Clark, R.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 : S85 - S85
  • [3] IMPLICIT VS. EXPLICIT LEARNING IN GERMAN NOUN PLURALS
    Kovic, Vanja
    Westermann, Gert
    Plunkett, Kim
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2008, 41 (04) : 387 - 411
  • [4] Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects
    Narganes-Pineda, Cristina
    Chica, Ana B.
    Lupianez, Juan
    Marotta, Andrea
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2023, 87 (01): : 242 - 259
  • [5] Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects
    Cristina Narganes-Pineda
    Ana B. Chica
    Juan Lupiáñez
    Andrea Marotta
    Psychological Research, 2023, 87 : 242 - 259
  • [6] Implicit vs. explicit power motive
    Maliszewski, Norbert
    Jankowska, Klaudyna
    Suszek, Hubert
    PROBLEMY ZARZADZANIA-MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2014, 12 (01): : 50 - 65
  • [7] Face recognition: Sparse Representation vs. Deep Learning
    Alskeini, Neamah H.
    Kien Nguyen Thanh
    Chandran, Vinod
    Boles, Wageeh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRAPHICS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICGSP 2018), 2018, : 31 - 37
  • [8] Face recognition: Encoding vs. recognition
    Pierre-Louis, J
    Azizian, A
    Staley, K
    Squires, N
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, : 172 - 173
  • [9] EBGM vs subspace projection for face recognition
    Stergiou, Andreas
    Pnevmatikakis, Aristodemos
    Polymenakos, Lazaros
    VISAPP 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 2, 2006, : 131 - +
  • [10] Learning kernel subspace for face recognition
    Li, Jianwu
    Hao, Wangli
    Zhang, Xiao
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2015, 151 : 1187 - 1197