Analysis of Stage and Clinical/Prognostic Factors for Lung Cancer From SEER Registries: AJCC Staging and Collaborative Stage Data Collection System

被引:126
|
作者
Chen, Vivien W. [1 ,2 ]
Ruiz, Bernardo A. [3 ]
Hsieh, Mei-Chin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiao-Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Ries, Lynn A. G. [4 ]
Lewis, Denise R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Louisiana Tumor Registry, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Program Epidemiol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[4] NCI, Surveillance Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
lung cancer; collaborative stage; AJCC; prognostic site-specific factors; FORTHCOMING 7TH EDITION; TNM CLASSIFICATION; PROPOSALS; PROJECT; REVISION; DESCRIPTORS; SURVIVAL; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29045
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDThe American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition introduced major changes in the staging of lung cancer, including the tumor (T), node (N), metastasis (M)TNMsystem and new stage/prognostic site-specific factors (SSFs), collected under the Collaborative Stage Version 2 (CSv2) Data Collection System. The intent was to improve the stage precision that could guide treatment options and ultimately lead to better survival. This report examines stage trends, the change in stage distributions from the AJCC 6th to the 7th edition, and findings of the prognostic SSFs for 2010 lung cancer cases. METHODSData were from the November 2012 submission of 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based registries. A total of 344,797 cases of lung cancer, diagnosed in 2004-2010, were analyzed. RESULTSThe percentages of small tumors and early-stage lung cancer cases increased from 2004 to 2010. The AJCC 7th edition, implemented for 2010 diagnosis year, subclassified tumor size and reclassified multiple tumor nodules, pleural effusions, and involvement of tumors in the contralateral lung, resulting in a slight decrease in stage IB and stage IIIB and a small increase in stage IIA and stage IV. Overall about 80% of cases remained the same stage group in the AJCC 6th and 7th editions. About 21% of lung cancer patients had separate tumor nodules in the ipsilateral (same) lung, and 23% of the surgically resected patients had visceral pleural invasion, both adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONSIt is feasible for high-quality population-based registries such as the SEER Program to collect more refined staging and prognostic SSFs that allows better categorization of lung cancer patients with different clinical outcomes and to assess their survival. Cancer 2014;120(23 suppl):3781-92. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. This report highlights the stage trends and changes in stage distributions for lung cancer as AJCC moved from the 6th to the 7th edition. Significant findings include an increase in small tumors over time and substantial stage shift both within and between stage groups that requires extra caution in data interpretation. About 21% of lung cancer cases had separate tumor nodules in the ipsilateral lung, and 23% of the surgically resected patients had pleural invasion, both adverse prognostic factors.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3781 / 3792
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic scoring system for stage IV colorectal cancer: is the AJCC sub-classification of stage IV colorectal cancer appropriate?
    Hirotoshi Kobayashi
    Kenjiro Kotake
    Kenichi Sugihara
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013, 18 : 696 - 703
  • [22] The clinical prognostic factors of patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma
    Sui, Qihai
    Liang, Jiaqi
    Hu, Zhengyang
    Xu, Xinming
    Chen, Zhencong
    Huang, Yiwei
    Zhao, Mengnan
    Zhan, Cheng
    Wang, Lin
    Lin, Zongwu
    Wang, Qun
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (11) : 4727 - 4738
  • [23] Prognostic factors in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer
    Suzuki, K
    Nagai, K
    Yoshida, J
    Moriyama, E
    Nishimura, M
    Takahashi, K
    Nishiwaki, Y
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (04): : 927 - 932
  • [24] The Added Prognostic Value of Oncotype Recurrence Score to AJCC Prognostic Staging System in Stage III ER+/HER2− Breast Cancer
    Maoli Wang
    Mingdi Zhang
    Hongliang Chen
    Advances in Therapy, 2023, 40 : 3912 - 3925
  • [25] The Added Prognostic Value of Oncotype Recurrence Score to AJCC Prognostic Staging System in Stage III ER+/HER2-Breast Cancer
    Wang, Maoli
    Zhang, Mingdi
    Chen, Hongliang
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2023, 40 (09) : 3912 - 3925
  • [26] Bladder Cancer Collaborative Stage Variables and Their Data Quality, Usage, and Clinical Implications: A Review of SEER Data, 2004-2010
    Charlton, Mary E.
    Adamo, Margaret
    Sun, Leon
    Deorah, Sundeep
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (23) : 3815 - 3825
  • [27] Improved Prognostication for the Updated AJCC Breast Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging Varied in Higher-Stage Groups
    Hu, Jintao
    Fung, Mei-Wai
    Tsang, Julia Y.
    Poon, Ivan K.
    Chan, Siu-Ki
    Cheung, Sai-Yin
    Hu, Hong
    Zhou, Dongxian
    Tse, Gary M.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2020, 20 (03) : 253 - +
  • [28] Prognostic factors in clinical stage IIIA small cell lung cancer: An analysis of a population-based cancer registry in Taiwan
    Yu, Sung-Chi
    Huang, Jing-Yang
    Cheng, Ya-Fu
    Cheng, Ching-Yuan
    Huang, Chang-Lun
    Hu, Wei-Heng
    Wang, Bing-Yen
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [29] Staging and clinical prognostic factors for small-cell lung cancer
    Argiris, A
    Murren, JR
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2001, 7 (05): : 437 - 447
  • [30] Prognostic factors in early stage lung cancer patients: Retrospective single center data.
    Alan, Ozkan
    Ercelep, Ozlem
    Telli, Tugba Akin
    Hasanov, Rahib
    Tuylu, Tugba Basoglu
    Simsek, Eda Tanrikulu
    Lacin, Tunc
    Bozkurtlar, Emine
    Babacan, Nalan
    Kaya, Serap
    Dane, Faysal
    Yumuk, Fulden Perran
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)