Evaluation of a breathing retraining intervention to improve quality of life in asthma: quantitative process analysis of the BREATHE randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Arden-Close, Emily Julia [1 ]
Kirby, Sarah E. [2 ]
Yardley, Lucy [2 ,3 ]
Bruton, Anne [4 ]
Ainsworth, Ben [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Thomas, D. Mike [5 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Talbot Campus, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Acad Unit Psychol, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Expt Psychol, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Primary Care & Populat Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
Breathing exercises; randomized controlled trial; quantitative process analysis; quality of life; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; QUESTIONNAIRE; EXPERIENCES; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0269215519832942
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Explore qualitative differences between interventions (DVD and booklet (DVDB) versus face-to-face and booklet (F2FB) versus usual care) in the BREATHE (Breathing Retraining for Asthma Trial of Home Exercises) trial of breathing retraining for asthma. Design: Quantitative process analysis exploring group expectancy, experience and practice before and after intervention delivery for the main trial. Setting: Primary care. Subjects: Adults with asthma (DVD and booklet, n = 261; F2FB, n = 132). Main measures: Baseline - expectancy about breathing retraining; follow-up 3, 6 and 12 months - self-efficacy, treatment experience (enjoyment of treatment, perceptions of physiotherapist, perceptions of barriers), amount of practice (weeks, days/week, times/day), continued practice; all time points - anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), AQLQ (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire). Results: No group differences in baseline expectancy. Statistically significant results (P < 0.05) indicated that at follow-up, F2FB participants perceived greater need for a physiotherapist than DVD and booklet participants (3.43 (0.87) versus 2.15 (1.26)). F2FB participants reported greater enjoyment of core techniques (such as stomach breathing: 7.42 (1.67) versus 6.13 (1.99) (DVD and booklet)). Fewer F2FB participants reported problems due to doubts (24 (22.9%) versus 90 (54.2%)). F2FB participants completed more practice sessions (75.01 (46.38) versus 48.56 (44.71)). Amount of practice was not significantly related to quality of life. In the DVD and booklet arm, greater confidence in breathing retraining ability explained 3.9% of variance in quality of life at 12 months. Conclusion: Adults with asthma receiving breathing retraining face-to-face report greater enjoyment and undertaking more practice than those receiving a DVD and booklet. Greater confidence in ability to do breathing retraining is associated with improved QoL.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1149
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Rachamin, Yael
    Grischott, Thomas
    Neuner-Jehle, Stefan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [42] New Ureteral Stent Design Does Not Improve Patient Quality of Life: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Davenport, Kim
    Kumar, Vivekanandan
    Collins, Justin
    Melotti, Roberto
    Timoney, Anthony G.
    Keeley, Francis X., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (01): : 175 - 178
  • [43] A personalized app to improve quality of life of patients with a stoma: A protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    van der Storm, Sebastiaan L. A.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    van Dieren, Susan P.
    Schijven, Marlies P.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (10) : 2071 - 2077
  • [44] Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: A randomized controlled trial
    Rummans, TA
    Clark, MM
    Sloan, JA
    Frost, MH
    Bostwick, JM
    Atherton, PJ
    Johnson, ME
    Gamble, G
    Richardson, J
    Brown, P
    Martensen, J
    Miller, J
    Piderman, K
    Huschka, M
    Girardi, J
    Hanson, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (04) : 635 - 642
  • [45] SURVIVOR STORIES: QUALITY OF LIFE RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A VIDEO NARRATIVE INTERVENTION
    Thompson, Tess
    Perez, Maria
    Yan, Yan
    Kreuter, Matthew
    Margenthaler, Julie
    Colditz, Graham
    Jeffe, Donna
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S225 - S225
  • [46] Influence of a nutritional intervention on dietary intake and quality of life in cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Uster, Alexandra
    Ruefenacht, Ursula
    Ruehlin, Maya
    Pless, Miklos
    Siano, Marco
    Haefner, Mark
    Imoberdorf, Reinhard
    Ballmer, Peter E.
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2013, 29 (11-12) : 1342 - 1349
  • [47] Enhancing quality of life in epilepsy with a digital intervention (emyna): Results of the ELAINE randomized controlled trial
    Meyer, Bjorn
    Betz, Linda T.
    Brueckner, Katja
    Holtkamp, Martin
    [J]. EPILEPSIA OPEN, 2024,
  • [48] Safety and feasibility of a quality of life intervention in a randomized controlled trial on patients with colorectal cancer.
    Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika
    Lindberg, Patricia
    Steinger, Brunhilde
    Koller, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [49] Change in quality of life after a multidisciplinary intervention for people with dementia: A cluster randomized controlled trial
    Klapwijk, Maartje S.
    Caljouw, Monique A. A.
    Pieper, Marjoleine J. C.
    Putter, Hein
    van der Steen, Jenny T.
    Achterberg, Wilco P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 33 (09) : 1213 - 1219
  • [50] The effect of educational intervention on the quality of life of family caregivers of hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Sotoudeh, Reza
    Alavi, Mousa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 12 (01) : 62