Evaluation of a breathing retraining intervention to improve quality of life in asthma: quantitative process analysis of the BREATHE randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Arden-Close, Emily Julia [1 ]
Kirby, Sarah E. [2 ]
Yardley, Lucy [2 ,3 ]
Bruton, Anne [4 ]
Ainsworth, Ben [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Thomas, D. Mike [5 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Talbot Campus, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Acad Unit Psychol, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Expt Psychol, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Southampton, Primary Care & Populat Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
Breathing exercises; randomized controlled trial; quantitative process analysis; quality of life; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; QUESTIONNAIRE; EXPERIENCES; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0269215519832942
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: Explore qualitative differences between interventions (DVD and booklet (DVDB) versus face-to-face and booklet (F2FB) versus usual care) in the BREATHE (Breathing Retraining for Asthma Trial of Home Exercises) trial of breathing retraining for asthma. Design: Quantitative process analysis exploring group expectancy, experience and practice before and after intervention delivery for the main trial. Setting: Primary care. Subjects: Adults with asthma (DVD and booklet, n = 261; F2FB, n = 132). Main measures: Baseline - expectancy about breathing retraining; follow-up 3, 6 and 12 months - self-efficacy, treatment experience (enjoyment of treatment, perceptions of physiotherapist, perceptions of barriers), amount of practice (weeks, days/week, times/day), continued practice; all time points - anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), AQLQ (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire). Results: No group differences in baseline expectancy. Statistically significant results (P < 0.05) indicated that at follow-up, F2FB participants perceived greater need for a physiotherapist than DVD and booklet participants (3.43 (0.87) versus 2.15 (1.26)). F2FB participants reported greater enjoyment of core techniques (such as stomach breathing: 7.42 (1.67) versus 6.13 (1.99) (DVD and booklet)). Fewer F2FB participants reported problems due to doubts (24 (22.9%) versus 90 (54.2%)). F2FB participants completed more practice sessions (75.01 (46.38) versus 48.56 (44.71)). Amount of practice was not significantly related to quality of life. In the DVD and booklet arm, greater confidence in breathing retraining ability explained 3.9% of variance in quality of life at 12 months. Conclusion: Adults with asthma receiving breathing retraining face-to-face report greater enjoyment and undertaking more practice than those receiving a DVD and booklet. Greater confidence in ability to do breathing retraining is associated with improved QoL.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1149
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patients’ experiences of breathing retraining for asthma: a qualitative process analysis of participants in the intervention arms of the BREATHE trial
    Emily Arden-Close
    Lucy Yardley
    Sarah Kirby
    Mike Thomas
    Anne Bruton
    [J]. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 27
  • [2] Patients' experiences of breathing retraining for asthma: a qualitative process analysis of participants in the intervention arms of the BREATHE trial
    Arden-Close, Emily
    Yardley, Lucy
    Kirby, Sarah
    Thomas, Mike
    Bruton, Anne
    [J]. NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 27
  • [3] The BREATHE study: Breathing REtraining for Asthma Trial of Home Exercises. A protocol summary of a randomised controlled trial
    Bruton, Anne
    Kirby, Sarah
    Arden-Close, Emily
    Taylor, Lynda
    Webley, Frances
    George, Steve
    Yardley, Lucy
    Price, David
    Moore, Michael
    Little, Paul
    Holgate, Stephen
    Djukanovic, Ratko
    Lee, Amanda J.
    Raftery, James
    Chorozoglou, Maria
    Versnel, Jenny
    Pavord, Ian
    Stafford-Watson, Mark
    Thomas, Mike
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (02): : PS1 - PS7
  • [4] Process Evaluation Of The "dash For Asthma" Intervention In A Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study
    Lv, N.
    Blonstein, A. C.
    Camargo, C. A.
    Wilson, S. R.
    Buist, S.
    Lavori, P.
    Strub, P.
    Nadeau, K. C.
    Xiao, L.
    Rosas, L. G.
    Ma, J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [5] Efficacy and feasibility of the BREATHE asthma intervention with American Indian children: a randomized controlled trial
    O'Leary, Rae A.
    O'Leary, Marcia A.
    Torgerson, Dara G.
    Mettler, Raeann D.
    Enright, Kendra J.
    Best, Lyle G.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy and feasibility of the BREATHE asthma intervention with American Indian children: a randomized controlled trial
    Rae A. O’Leary
    Marcia A. O’Leary
    Dara G. Torgerson
    Raeann D. Mettler
    Kendra J. Enright
    Lyle G. Best
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [7] Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma - a randomized controlled trial
    Prem, Venkatesan
    Sahoo, Ramesh Chandra
    Adhikari, Prabha
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 27 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [8] BREATHE OUT: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Structured Intervention to Improve Clinician Satisfaction With "Difficult" Visits
    Edgoose, Jennifer Y. C.
    Regner, Caitlin J.
    Zakletskaia, Larissa I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [9] Breathing-based leg exercises during hemodialysis improve quality of life: A randomized controlled trial
    Huang, Hsin-Yi
    Hung, Kuo-Sheng
    Yeh, Mei-Ling
    Chou, Hsiu-Ling
    Yeh, Albert Lou
    Liao, Tzu-Yi
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (08) : 1175 - 1184
  • [10] An Internet Intervention to Improve Asthma Management: Rationale and Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Arguel, Amael
    Lau, Annie Ys
    Dennis, Sarah
    Liaw, Siaw-Teng
    Coiera, Enrico
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2013, 2 (02):