A national survey of neurological monitoring practice after obstetric regional anaesthesia in the UK

被引:5
|
作者
Roderick, E. [1 ]
Hoyle, J. [3 ]
Yentis, S. M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Anaesthesia, London, England
[2] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, London, England
[3] Whipps Cross Hosp & Chest Clin, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll, London, England
关键词
epidural analgesia: complications; spinal anaesthesia: complications; spinal anaesthesia complications: MRI indications; SPINAL EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; CESAREAN-SECTION;
D O I
10.1111/anae.13800
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Neuraxial anaesthesia is widely used in obstetrics and neurological complications are rare. However, when they occur, subsequent investigation and management are time-critical and correlate with the extent of neurological recovery. The Third National Audit Project recommended the implementation of guidelines in obstetric epidural management, including advice on monitoring for early signs of problems and acting upon concerns. However, no national guideline exists for postoperative management in the obstetric population. We conducted a national survey of monitoring after obstetric neuraxial blockade and the management of an abnormally prolonged block. We received responses from 112/189 (59.3%) obstetric anaesthetic leads invited to participate. We determined that post-neuraxial blockade monitoring in the UK is highly variable: only 63/112 (56.3%) respondents' units had a monitoring policy in place, although most of these did not undertake formal neurological monitoring, and a range of different monitoring methods and schedules were employed. In 12/63 (19%) local policies, the first review of neurology was performed at the standard postoperative visit the following day, and 66/112 (58.9%) units had no protocol in place to address emergency management of abnormally prolonged neuraxial blockade. Where a policy was in place, the initial recommended action and the type of imaging used were variable.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 759
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Consensus on the management of obstetric cholestasis: national UK survey
    Memtsa, M.
    Pun, S.
    West, P.
    Okolo, S.
    Yoong, W.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (07) : 910 - 911
  • [42] Obstetric epidural test doses: a survey of UK practice
    Gardner, IC
    Kinsella, SM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 14 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [43] National obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK 1997/1998
    Khor, LJH
    Jeskins, G
    Cooper, GM
    Paterson-Brown, S
    ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (12) : 1168 - 1172
  • [44] A national survey of the effects of fatigue on trainees in anaesthesia in the UK
    McClelland, L.
    Holland, J.
    Lomas, J. -P.
    Redfern, N.
    Plunkett, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (09) : 1069 - 1077
  • [45] Neurophysiological investigation of neurological complication after regional anaesthesia
    Péréon, Y
    Tich, SNT
    Mussini, JM
    Charles, F
    Malinovsky, JM
    ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 57 (04) : 416 - 417
  • [46] Factors Influencing the Preference of Regional Anaesthesia in the Obstetric Population: A Survey Study
    Karaaslan, Pelin
    Aydin, Coskun
    Aksu, Tarik
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2014, 42 (04) : 176 - 181
  • [47] Monitoring after neuraxial opioids for caesarean section: a survey of UK practice
    Campbell, J. P.
    Sabharwal, A.
    Harrop-Griffiths, W.
    Malhotra, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (01) : 102 - 103
  • [48] Breastfeeding and anaesthesia: a national survey of current anaesthetic practice in breastfeeding women undergoing non-obstetric surgery
    Jenkins, E.
    Weale, N.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 : 150 - 150
  • [49] Contraindications to regional and anaesthesia in obstebics: a survey of German practice
    Stamer, U. M.
    Stuber, F.
    Wiese, R.
    Wulf, H.
    Meuser, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2007, 16 (04) : 328 - 335
  • [50] Paediatric regional anaesthesia, a survey of practice in the United Kingdom
    Sanders, JC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (05) : 707 - 710