Lead Location as Assessed on Cardiac Computed Tomography and Difficulty of Percutaneous Transvenous Extraction

OBJECTIVES This study sought to retrospectively investigate outcomes of lead extraction by using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to identify risk of complicated lead extraction to aid in pre-procedural planning. BACKGROUND Transvenous lead extractions remain high-risk procedures requiring specialized operators, equipment, and surgical backup. Data are lacking for how to identify difficult lead extractions. CT scans, which can illustrate the proximity of the lead to adherent venous structures can potentially aid in identifying difficult lead extractions. METHODS All cases of patients who were undergoing transvenous lead extractions at the authors' institution between 2015 and 2018, who had a pre-operative CT scan prior to lead extraction, were reviewed. The images were retrospectively reviewed to examine adherence of leads to the surrounding vein and obtained procedural outcomes. RESULTS A total of 203 cases were reviewed of patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction who had a preoperative CT scan, and scans were separated based on lead location in the superior vena cava, as assessed by CT imaging. Scans were divided into 3 groups: those in a central location or <1 cm adherence (n = 28); those that had at least 1 lead with tip adherent >1 cm (n -137); or those that had at least 1 lead outside the vein contour (n = 38). Although there was only 1 serious complication requiring vascular surgery intervention, patients with at least 1 lead outside the vein contour required significantly longer procedural time (190.8 +/- 86.6 min vs. 158.1 +/- 73.7 min vs. 142.8 +/- 52.2 min; p 0.019) and fluoroscopy time (33.1 +/- 24.2 min vs. 19.6 +/- 18.4 min vs. 18.3 +/- 16.4 min; p = 0.0006) than those with leads adhering >1 cm and centrally located leads, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pre-operative CT scanning can identify difficult lead extractions prior to performing the procedure. This information may aid etectrophysiotogists in the planning of extraction procedures. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.