Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

被引:172
|
作者
Blake, GM
Fogelman, I
机构
[1] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, St Thomas St
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0001-2998(97)80025-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Since its introduction nearly ten years ago, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has become the single most widely used technique for performing bone densitometry studies. One reason for its popularity is the ability of DXA systems to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and proximal femur, the two most common sites for osteoporotic fractures. Other advantages of DXA include the exceptionally low radiation dose to patients, short scan times, high resolution images, good precision and inherent stability of calibration. For these reasons DXA scans are widely used to diagnose osteoporosis, assist making decisions in treatment, and as a follow-up response to therapy. Another important application has been the use of DXA in many clinical trials of new treatments for osteoporosis. Since the first generation pencil beam DXA systems became available, the most significant technical innovation has been the introduction of fan beam systems with shorter scan times, increased patient throughput, and improved image quality. New clinical applications include the measurement of lateral spine and total body BMD, body composition, and vertebral morphometry. Despite these advances, posteroanterior (PA) spine and proximal femur scans remain the most widely used application because of their utility in treatment decisions and monitoring response to therapy. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 228
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in obesity
    Bazzocchi, Alberto
    Diano, Danila
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (01) : 48 - 48
  • [22] ACRONYM FOR DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    WILSON, CR
    COLLIER, BD
    CARRERA, GF
    JACOBSON, DR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) : 875 - 875
  • [23] Precision of a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry device
    Forkusuz, F
    Isikli, S
    Akin, S
    Ungan, M
    Senköylü, A
    Aras, NK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2004, 259 (03) : 365 - 368
  • [24] Emerging trends in dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
    Wilson, Kevin E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2007, 10 (01)
  • [25] Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in osteopetrosis
    Adler, IN
    Stine, KC
    Kurtzburg, J
    Kinder, DL
    Cox, KS
    Lensing, SY
    Seibert, JJ
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 93 (05) : 501 - 503
  • [26] Dual X-ray absorptiometry
    Altman, Albert
    Aaron, Ronald
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2012, 80 (07) : 621 - 626
  • [27] Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry
    El-Desouki, MI
    Sherafzal, MS
    Othman, SA
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (09) : 1346 - 1350
  • [28] THE TECHNICAL AND THE LOGISTICAL FEASIBILITY OF SCREENING A PERIMENOPAUSAL POPULATION WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    PURDIE, DW
    HOWEY, S
    STEEL, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 : S351 - S351
  • [29] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in practice, technical aspects, and precision testing
    Cherian, Kripa Elizabeth
    Kapoor, Nitin
    Meeta, Meeta
    Paul, Thomas Vizhalil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MID-LIFE HEALTH, 2021, 12 (04) : 252 - 256
  • [30] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry technical issues: The 2007 ISCD Official Positions
    Schousboe, John T.
    Vokes, Tamara
    Broy, Susan B.
    Ferrar, Lynne
    McKiernan, Fergus
    Roux, Christian
    Binkley, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2008, 11 (01) : 92 - 108