On the Ontological Foundations of Process-Based Logic

The article continues the discussion of the problems expressed by A.V. Smirnov in the article "Procedural logic and its justification". The author refers to the clarification of the ontological foundations of procedural logic, not touching on purely formal logical problems. The article notes that the lack of a common premise in Syllogism 1, introduced by A.V. Smirnov as a form of apodictic proof characteristic of procedural logic, indicates that Syllogism 1 draws up statements about such actions, the beginning of which is rooted in a particular situation, and is not derived from already known general concepts. If traditional logic has an ontology of genus-species relations as its ontological basis, then the ontological basis of procedural logic, as stated in the article, is the ontology of a particular being (haecceitas Duns Scot). The author identifies in the ontology of a specific two regions - the region of culture and the region of the situation. Both for the cognition/mastering of the cultural phenomenon, and for the cognition/mastering of the object of a particular situation an active attitude, action with these phenomena and objects real experience is important. Conclusion. The ontological basis of procedural logic is the existential nature of the not possible (I. Kant's position), but real experience, which always takes place in specific situations, connections and relationships in which require an understanding of This State Here and -Now. Thinking about It in the here-and-now in need of special means of understanding the dynamic, time-honored activities/processes on the traditional logic of thinking is not able to and what processes the logic aim. Since it is the actions/procedures that are important for the culture, the decision making by the individual should be based on such conclusions, which build the relations of actions/procedures in specific situations, and not the relations of some substantial formations (genus-species relations). Process logic, unlike traditional logic, is capable of showing the formation of sense, it is the logic of sense, which thanks to G. Deleuze and A.V. Smirnov claims his right to exist.