Effect of pelvic floor and transversus abdominis muscle contraction on inter-rectus distance in postpartum women: a cross-sectional experimental study

被引:32
|
作者
Theodorsen, N-M [1 ]
Strand, L., I [1 ]
Bo, K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Physiotherapy Res Grp, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018 Bergen, Norway
[2] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Dept Sports Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Lorenskog, Norway
关键词
Diastasis rectus abdominis; Inter-rectus distance; Pelvic floor; Transversus abdominis; Ultrasonography; Measurement; RISK-FACTORS; DIASTASIS; PREGNANCY; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; EXERCISES; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.physio.2018.08.009
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the effect of acute isometric contraction of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) and transversus abdominis muscle (TrAM) on inter-rectus distance (IRD) from resting values in postpartum women with diastasis rectus abdominis (DRA). Design Cross sectional experimental study. Setting Physiotherapy clinic. Participants Thirty eight postpartum women presenting with DRA of at least two finger widths. Methods Two dimensional ultrasound images of IRD were recorded using a linear probe (5 to 10 MHz) at rest, during PFM contraction, during TrAM contraction, and during combined PFM and TrAM contraction. IRD data were normally distributed. Main outcome measure Change in IRD. Results There was a significant increase in IRD during PFM and TrAM contraction compared with IRD at rest. At 2 cm above the umbilicus, mean PFM was 26.9 [standard deviation (SD) 8.8] mm vs rest 25.7 (SD 8.5) mm {mean difference 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7 to 1.7] mm}; and mean TrAM was 28.4 (SD 9.0) mm vs rest 25.7 (SD 8.5) mm [mean difference 2.8 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.6) mm] Similarly, 2 cm below the umbilicus, mean PFM was 22 (SD 8.3) mm vs rest 21 (SD 7.9) mm [mean difference 0.9 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.6) mm]; and mean TrAM was 23.3 (SD 8.7) mm vs rest 21 (SD 7.9) mm [mean difference 2.3 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.1) mm]. Combined TrAM and PFM contraction measured 2 cm above the umbilicus caused the greatest increase in IRD: mean PFM + TrAM 29.6 (SD 9.4) mm vs rest 25.7 (SD 8.5) mm [mean difference 3.9 (95% CI 2.8 to 5.0) mm]. Conclusion Both PFM and TrAM contraction, and combined PFM and TrAM contraction increased IRD in postpartum women with DRA. (C) 2018 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 320
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-sectional study of early postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and related bother in primiparous women 6–10 weeks postpartum
    Thorgerdur Sigurdardottir
    Kari Bø
    Thora Steingrimsdottir
    Thorhallur I. Halldorsson
    Thor Aspelund
    Reynir T. Geirsson
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 1847 - 1855
  • [32] Pelvic girdle pain in Indian postpartum women: a cross-sectional study
    Mukkannavar, Prashant
    Desai, B. R.
    Mohanty, Umasankar
    Kulkarni, Shweta
    Parvatikar, Vijeta
    Daiwajna, Sneha
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 30 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [33] Relationship between pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study
    Maíra de Menezes Franco
    Patricia Driusso
    Kari Bø
    Daniela Cristina Carvalho de Abreu
    Lucia Alves da Silva Lara
    Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva
    Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 931 - 936
  • [34] Relationship between pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study
    Franco, Maria de Menezes
    Driusso, Patricia
    Bo, Kari
    Carvalho de Abreu, Daniela Cristina
    da Silva Lara, Lucia Alves
    Japur de Sa Rosa e Silva, Ana Carolina
    Jorge Ferreira, Cristine Homsi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (06) : 931 - 936
  • [35] Asymmetries of the Muscle Mechanical Properties of the Pelvic Floor in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women, and Men: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza, Daiana
    Sartorato Beleza, Ana Carolina
    Garcia-Luque, Lourdes
    Alcaraz-Clariana, Sandra
    Carmona-Perez, Cristina
    De Miguel-Rubio, Amaranta
    Teresa Garzon-Alfaro, Maria
    Cruz-Medel, Ines
    Luis Garrido-Castro, Juan
    Alburquerque-Sendin, Francisco
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (10):
  • [36] Evaluation of Awareness, Adherence, and Barriers of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Pregnant Women: A Cross-sectional Study
    Bayat, Masoumeh
    Eshraghi, Narjes
    Naeiji, Zahra
    Fathi, Marzieh
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (01): : E122 - E126
  • [37] Obesity and pelvic floor muscle function in young nulligravid: a cross-sectional study
    Avila, Mariana Arias
    da Silva, Jordana Barbosa
    Hirakawa, Humberto Sadanobu
    Pereira-Baldon, Vanessa dos Santos
    Driusso, Patricia
    OBESITY RESEARCH & CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 15 (04) : 409 - 411
  • [38] Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in the First Trimester of Primipara: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gao, Lei
    Wang, Shiyan
    Zhang, Di
    Zhu, Hongmei
    Jia, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Haibo
    Li, Suhong
    Fu, Xiuhong
    Sun, Xiuli
    Wang, Jianliu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (06)
  • [39] Cross-sectional study of early postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction and related bother in primiparous women 6-10 weeks postpartum
    Sigurdardottir, Thorgerdur
    Bo, Kari
    Steingrimsdottir, Thora
    Halldorsson, Thorhallur I.
    Aspelund, Thor
    Geirsson, Reynir T.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (07) : 1847 - 1855
  • [40] Is Pelvic Floor Dysfunction an Independent Threat to Sexual Function? A Cross-Sectional Study in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
    Li-Yun-Fong, Ryan J.
    Larouche, Maryse
    Hyakutake, Momoe
    Koenig, Nicole
    Lovatt, Catherine
    Geoffrion, Roxana
    Brotto, Lori A.
    Lee, Terry
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (02): : 226 - 237