Highly parameterized model calibration with cloud computing: an example of regional flow model calibration in northeast Alberta, Canada

被引:0
|
作者
Hayley, Kevin [1 ]
Schumacher, J. [1 ]
MacMillan, G. J. [1 ]
Boutin, L. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Matrix Solut Inc, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
Canada; Numerical modeling; Inverse modeling; Cloud computing; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10040-014-1110-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Expanding groundwater datasets collected by automated sensors, and improved groundwater databases, have caused a rapid increase in calibration data available for groundwater modeling projects. Improved methods of subsurface characterization have increased the need for model complexity to represent geological and hydrogeological interpretations. The larger calibration datasets and the need for meaningful predictive uncertainty analysis have both increased the degree of parameterization necessary during model calibration. Due to these competing demands, modern groundwater modeling efforts require a massive degree of parallelization in order to remain computationally tractable. A methodology for the calibration of highly parameterized, computationally expensive models using the Amazon EC2 cloud computing service is presented. The calibration of a regional-scale model of groundwater flow in Alberta, Canada, is provided as an example. The model covers a 30,865-km(2) domain and includes 28 hydrostratigraphic units. Aquifer properties were calibrated to more than 1,500 static hydraulic head measurements and 10 years of measurements during industrial groundwater use. Three regionally extensive aquifers were parameterized (with spatially variable hydraulic conductivity fields), as was the aerial recharge boundary condition, leading to 450 adjustable parameters in total. The PEST-based model calibration was parallelized on up to 250 computing nodes located on Amazon's EC2 servers.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 737
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional calibration of a watershed model
    Fernandez, W
    Vogel, RM
    Sankarasubramanian, A
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2000, 45 (05): : 689 - 707
  • [2] Parallel computing for automated model calibration
    Burke, JS
    Danielson, GR
    Schulz, DA
    Vail, LW
    6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XVIII, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS OF SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, 2002, : 424 - 429
  • [3] Calibration of a regional groundwater flow model using environmental isotope data
    Plümacher, J
    Kinzelbach, W
    TRACERS AND MODELLING IN HYDROGEOLOGY, 2000, (262): : 439 - 445
  • [4] Calibration of a cloud rise model for a RDD scenario
    Yaar, Ilan
    Sharon, Avi
    PREVENTION, DETECTION AND RESPONSE TO NUCLEAR AND RADIOLOGICAL THREATS, 2008, : 193 - +
  • [5] A suggestion for computing objective function in model calibration
    Wu, Yiping
    Liu, Shuguang
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 24 : 107 - 111
  • [6] Regional calibration of the Pitman model for the Okavango River
    Hughes, Denis A.
    Andersson, Lotta
    Wilk, Julie
    Savenije, Hubert H. G.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 331 (1-2) : 30 - 42
  • [7] Improved Hadoop-based cloud for complex model simulation optimization: Calibration of SWAT as an example
    Ma, Jinfeng
    Rao, Kaifeng
    Li, Ruonan
    Yang, Yanzheng
    Li, Weifeng
    Zheng, Hua
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 149
  • [8] Data Processing in Cloud Computing Model on the Example of Salesforce Cloud
    Maranda, Witold
    Poniszewska-Maranda, Aneta
    Szymczynska, Malgorzata
    INFORMATION, 2022, 13 (02)
  • [9] Impact of geostatistical reconstruction approaches on model calibration for flow in highly heterogeneous aquifers
    Martina Siena
    Monica Riva
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2020, 34 : 1591 - 1606
  • [10] Impact of geostatistical reconstruction approaches on model calibration for flow in highly heterogeneous aquifers
    Siena, Martina
    Riva, Monica
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 34 (10) : 1591 - 1606