Yield and nutritive value response to row spacing and cultivar in forage rice

被引:5
|
作者
Nakano, Hiroshi [1 ,2 ]
Hattori, Ikuo [3 ]
Morita, Satoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Kyushu Okinawa Agr Res Ctr, Chikugo, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Inst Crop Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Kyushu Okinawa Agr Res Ctr, Koshi, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
Oryza sativa L; yield; Cultivar 'Ruriaoba'; forage rice; row spacing; DRY-MATTER YIELD; CUTTING HEIGHT; 1ST CROP; PERFORMANCE; VARIETIES; NITROGEN; HARVEST;
D O I
10.1111/grs.12039
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Although the forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar 'Ruriaoba' has very high dry matter (DM) yield, it readily lodges after heading because of its high plant height. As a result, seed production and conventional cultivation of 'Ruriaoba' are very difficult. To improve this situation, we examined the effects of cultivar ('Ruriaoba' or 'Tachiaoba') and row spacing (30 [30-30-30-30]cm, 45 [30-30-30-45]cm, or 60 [30-30-30-60]cm) on the yield and nutritive value of forage rice. The lodging score of 'Tachiaoba' did not differ among row spacings but that of 'Ruriaoba' decreased with increasing row spacing. 'Ruriaoba' had lower grain yield than 'Tachiaoba'. Among its components, 'Ruriaoba' had fewer spikelets per m(2), fewer spikelets per panicle and lower 1000-grain weight than 'Tachiaoba'. 'Ruriaoba' had fewer grains per m(2) than 'Tachiaoba'. Grain yield and its components did not differ among row spacings, nor did the number of grains per m(2). Thus, 'Ruriaoba' planted at 60-cm row spacing may not decrease the grain yield and number of grains without lodging. This type of low-density planting of 'Ruriaoba' may be useful for seed production. At heading and yellow ripe stages, 'Ruriaoba' had higher DM yield than 'Tachiaoba' because 'Ruriaoba' had higher number of panicles than 'Tachiaoba'. Furthermore, 'Ruriaoba' had higher total digestible nutrients (TDN) yield than 'Tachiaoba'. At heading, DM yield decreased with increasing row spacing because the number of panicles decreased with increasing row spacing. Total digestible nutrients yield was lower at 45- and 60-cm row spacings than at 30-cm row spacing. However, at heading and yellow ripe, 'Ruriaoba' planted at 60-cm row spacing had DM and TDN yields similar to those of 'Tachiaoba' planted at 30-cm row spacing. Such low-density planting of 'Ruriaoba' may be an option for forage rice production.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRANSPLANTED SUGARBEET YIELD RESPONSE TO IN-ROW SPACING
    SMITH, JA
    YONTS, CD
    WILSON, RG
    ROBB, JG
    KERR, ED
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1988, 31 (05): : 1322 - 1325
  • [32] Row spacing and weed control timing affect yield of aerobic rice
    Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
    Johnson, David E.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 121 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [33] UPLAND RICE CULTIVAR RESPONSES TO ROW SPACING AND WATER STRESS ACROSS MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS
    Bryan Heinemann, Alexandre
    Ramirez-Villegas, Julian
    Stephan Nascente, Adriano
    Marques Zeviani, Walmes
    Fernando Stone, Luis
    Cesar Sentelhas, Paulo
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2017, 53 (04) : 609 - 626
  • [34] Forage yield and nutritive value of Panicum maximum genotypes in the Brazilian savannah
    Fernandes, Francisco Duarte
    Braga Ramos, Allan Kardec
    Jank, Liana
    Carvalho, Marcelo Ayres
    Martha, Geraldo Bueno, Jr.
    Braga, Gustavo Jose
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2014, 71 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [35] Tar spot impacts silage corn yield and forage nutritive value
    Kaur, Harkirat
    Chilvers, Martin
    Cassida, Kimberly
    Singh, Maninder Pal
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [36] Impact of cultivar, row spacing and seeding rate on ascochyta blight severity and yield of chickpea
    Chang, K. F.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    Hwang, S. F.
    Gossen, B. D.
    Howard, R. J.
    Warkentin, T. D.
    Strelkov, S. E.
    Blade, S. F.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2007, 87 (02) : 395 - 403
  • [37] Forage yield performance and nutritive value of selected wild soybean ecotypes
    Zhai, Guiyu
    Shen, Yixin
    Zhai, Yujia
    Liu, Xinbao
    Jiang, Huixin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2008, 88 (03) : 465 - 472
  • [38] Forage Yield and Nutritive Value Responses to Insecticide and Host Resistance in Alfalfa
    Sulc, R. Mark
    McCormick, John S.
    Hammond, Ronald B.
    Miller, David J.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (03) : 1346 - 1355
  • [39] Biomass partitioning, forage nutritive value, and yield of contrasting genotypes of timothy
    Brégard, A
    Bélanger, G
    Michaud, R
    Tremblay, GF
    CROP SCIENCE, 2001, 41 (04) : 1212 - 1219
  • [40] EVALUATION OF HERBAGE YIELD AND NUTRITIVE VALUE OF EIGHT FORAGE CROP SPECIES
    Akdeniz, H.
    Hosaflioglu, I
    Koc, A.
    Hossain, A.
    Islam, M. S.
    Iqbal, M. A.
    Imtiaz, H.
    Gharib, H.
    El Sabagh, A.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (03): : 5571 - 5581