Yield and nutritive value response to row spacing and cultivar in forage rice

被引:5
|
作者
Nakano, Hiroshi [1 ,2 ]
Hattori, Ikuo [3 ]
Morita, Satoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Kyushu Okinawa Agr Res Ctr, Chikugo, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Inst Crop Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[3] Natl Agr & Food Res Org NARO, Kyushu Okinawa Agr Res Ctr, Koshi, Kumamoto, Japan
关键词
Oryza sativa L; yield; Cultivar 'Ruriaoba'; forage rice; row spacing; DRY-MATTER YIELD; CUTTING HEIGHT; 1ST CROP; PERFORMANCE; VARIETIES; NITROGEN; HARVEST;
D O I
10.1111/grs.12039
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Although the forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar 'Ruriaoba' has very high dry matter (DM) yield, it readily lodges after heading because of its high plant height. As a result, seed production and conventional cultivation of 'Ruriaoba' are very difficult. To improve this situation, we examined the effects of cultivar ('Ruriaoba' or 'Tachiaoba') and row spacing (30 [30-30-30-30]cm, 45 [30-30-30-45]cm, or 60 [30-30-30-60]cm) on the yield and nutritive value of forage rice. The lodging score of 'Tachiaoba' did not differ among row spacings but that of 'Ruriaoba' decreased with increasing row spacing. 'Ruriaoba' had lower grain yield than 'Tachiaoba'. Among its components, 'Ruriaoba' had fewer spikelets per m(2), fewer spikelets per panicle and lower 1000-grain weight than 'Tachiaoba'. 'Ruriaoba' had fewer grains per m(2) than 'Tachiaoba'. Grain yield and its components did not differ among row spacings, nor did the number of grains per m(2). Thus, 'Ruriaoba' planted at 60-cm row spacing may not decrease the grain yield and number of grains without lodging. This type of low-density planting of 'Ruriaoba' may be useful for seed production. At heading and yellow ripe stages, 'Ruriaoba' had higher DM yield than 'Tachiaoba' because 'Ruriaoba' had higher number of panicles than 'Tachiaoba'. Furthermore, 'Ruriaoba' had higher total digestible nutrients (TDN) yield than 'Tachiaoba'. At heading, DM yield decreased with increasing row spacing because the number of panicles decreased with increasing row spacing. Total digestible nutrients yield was lower at 45- and 60-cm row spacings than at 30-cm row spacing. However, at heading and yellow ripe, 'Ruriaoba' planted at 60-cm row spacing had DM and TDN yields similar to those of 'Tachiaoba' planted at 30-cm row spacing. Such low-density planting of 'Ruriaoba' may be an option for forage rice production.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forage yield and nutritive value of summer legumes as affected by row spacing and harvest timing
    Baath, Gurjinder S.
    Sarkar, Sayantan
    Sapkota, Bala Ram
    Flynn, K. Colton
    Northup, Brian K.
    Gowda, Prasanna H.
    FARMING SYSTEM, 2024, 2 (01):
  • [2] Cultivar and environment effects on annual ryegrass forage yield, yield distribution, and nutritive value
    Redfearn, DD
    Venuto, BC
    Pitman, WD
    Alison, MW
    Ward, JD
    CROP SCIENCE, 2002, 42 (06) : 2049 - 2054
  • [3] Influence of population density, row spacing and hybrid on forage corn yield and nutritive value in a cool-season environment
    Baron, V. S.
    Najda, H. G.
    Stevenson, F. C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (04) : 1131 - 1138
  • [4] Five decades of alfalfa cultivar improvement: Impact on forage yield, persistence, and nutritive value
    Lamb, JFS
    Sheaffer, CC
    Rhodes, LH
    Sulc, RM
    Undersander, DJ
    Brummer, EC
    CROP SCIENCE, 2006, 46 (02) : 902 - 909
  • [5] Dry Matter Yield Response to Seeding Rate and Row Spacing in Direct-seeded and Double-harvested Forage Rice
    Nakano, Hiroshi
    Hattori, Ikuo
    Morita, Satoshi
    JARQ-JAPAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2019, 53 (04): : 255 - 264
  • [6] EFFECTS OF FUNGICIDES, ROW SPACING AND CULTIVAR ON POTATO BIOMASS AND YIELD
    Hermeziu, Manuela
    Morar, Gavrila
    Stefan, Floriana Maria
    Hermeziu, Radu
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37 : 161 - 167
  • [7] Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality
    Iptas, S.
    Acar, A. A.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (11) : 515 - 522
  • [8] EFFECT OF ROW SPACING ON FORAGE YIELD OF CHRYSOPOGON-FULVUS
    DWIVEDI, GK
    KANODIA, KC
    SINGH, RP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1988, 58 (05): : 408 - 410
  • [9] Effect of cultivar, row spacing, and weed management on weed biomass, potato yield, and net crop value
    Conley, SP
    Binning, LK
    Connell, TR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 2001, 78 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [10] Effect of cultivar, row spacing, and weed management on weed biomass, potato yield, and net crop value
    Shawn P. Conley
    Larry K. Binning
    Timothy R. Connell
    American Journal of Potato Research, 2001, 78 : 31 - 37