Impact of medical eligibility criteria and OPTN policy on simultaneous liver kidney allocation and utilization

被引:6
|
作者
Singal, Ashwani K. [1 ,2 ]
Kuo, Yong-Fang [3 ]
Kwo, Paul [4 ]
Mahmud, Nadim [5 ]
Sharma, Pratima [6 ]
Nadim, Mitra K. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Dakota, Sanford Sch Med, Dept Med, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 USA
[2] Avera McKennan Univ Hosp & Transplant Inst, Sioux Falls, SD USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Bios Tatis Tics & Prevent Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Med Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
cirrhosis; dialysis; ESRD; HRS; OPTN; TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOMES; ACCESS; US;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.14700
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented medical eligibility and safety-net policy on 8/10/17 to optimize simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) utilization. We examined impact of this policy on SLK listings and number of kidneys used within 1-yr. of receiving liver transplantation (LT) alone. Methods and results OPTN database (08/10/14-06/12/20) on adults (N = 66 709) without previous transplant stratified candidates to listings for SLK or LT alone with pre-LT renal dysfunction at listing (eGFR < 30 mL/min or on dialysis). Outcomes were compared for pre (08/10/14-08/09/17) vs. post (08/10/17-06/12/20) policy era. SLK listings decreased in post vs. pre policy era (8.7% vs. 9.6%; P < .001), with 22% reduced odds of SLK listing in the postpolicy era, with a decrease in all OPTN regions except regions 6 and 8, which showed an increase. Among LT-alone recipients with pre-LT renal dysfunction (N = 3272), cumulative 1-year probability was higher in post vs. prepolicy period for dialysis (5.6% vs. 2.3%; P < .0001), KT listing (11.4% vs. 2.0%; P < .0001), and KT (3.7% vs. .25%; P < .0001). Sixty-seven (2.4%) kidneys were saved in post policy era, with 18.1%, 16.6%, 4.3%, and 2.9% saving from regions 7, 2, 11, and 1, respectively. Conclusion Medical eligibility and safety-net OPTN policy resulted in decreased SLK use and improved access to LT alone among those with pre-LT renal dysfunction. Although decreased in postpolicy era, regional variation of SLK listings remains. In spite of increased use of KT within 1-year of receiving LT alone under safety net, less number of kidneys were used without impact on patient survival in postpolicy era.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early Impact of the New United Network for Organ Sharing Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Allocation Policy: Improved Standardization but Similar Utilization.
    Cullaro, G.
    Verna, E. C.
    Lai, J. C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 555 - 556
  • [22] Impact of organ allocation policy change in simultaneous liver kidney organ transplant in the Unites States: an institutional experience
    Mercado, L. A.
    Bhangu, H. K.
    Croome, K. P.
    Hodge, D.
    Harnois, D. M.
    Wadei, H. M.
    Mao, S. A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (09) : 206 - 206
  • [23] Initial experience with the Expanded Criteria Donor kidney allocation system: Impact on utilization.
    Guidinger, MK
    Sung, RS
    Lake, CD
    McBride, MA
    Greenstein, SM
    Delmonico, FL
    Port, FK
    Merion, RM
    Leichtman, AB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 160 - 160
  • [24] THE IMPACT OF RACE-ADJUSTED GFR ESTIMATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR SIMULTANEOUS LIVER-KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Panchal, Sarjukumar
    Serper, Marina
    Bittermann, Therese
    Asrani, Sumeet K.
    Goldberg, David S.
    Mahmud, Nadim
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 : 866A - 866A
  • [25] FATE OF LIVER AND KIDNEY TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES BEFORE AND AFTER SIMULTANEOUS LIVER-KIDNEY TRANSPLANT ALLOCATION POLICY CHANGE
    Shimada, Shingo
    Kitajima, Toshihiro
    Lisznyai, Eric
    Suzuki, Yukiko
    Kuno, Yasutaka
    Flores, Alexander
    Sukkarieh, Nicole
    Collins, Kelly
    Rizzari, Michael
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Abouljoud, Marwan S.
    Nagai, Shunji
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 40A - 40A
  • [26] One size does not fit all: Differential benefits of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation by eligibility criteria
    Cheng, Xingxing S.
    Mcelroy, Lisa M.
    Sanoff, Scott L.
    Kwong, Allison J.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 29 (11) : 1208 - 1215
  • [27] THE IMPACT OF MELD ALLOCATION POLICY ON UTILIZATION OF HIGH RISK ORGANS FOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Volk, Michael L.
    Lok, Anna S. F.
    Pelletier, Shown J.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 48 (04) : 315A - 316A
  • [28] Trends in Liver Transplantation in Patients with Renal Failure Since Implementation of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Allocation Policy
    Altshuler, P. J.
    Shaheen, O.
    Shah, A. P.
    Glorioso, J.
    Frank, A.
    Ramirez, C.
    Maley, W.
    Bodzin, A. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 503 - 504
  • [29] Mission accomplished? Early data from the simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation allocation policy
    Asrani, Sumeet K.
    Levitsky, Josh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (11) : 3513 - 3515
  • [30] Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplant (SLK) Allocation Policy Change Proposal: Is It Really a Smart Move?
    Wadei, H. M.
    Gonwa, T. A.
    Taner, C. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (09) : 2763 - 2764