Impact of the Transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM on the Identification of Pregnancy Episodes in US Health Insurance Claims Data

被引:50
|
作者
Sarayani, Amir [1 ]
Wang, Xi [1 ]
Thuy Nhu Thai [1 ,2 ]
Albogami, Yasser [1 ,3 ]
Jeon, Nakyung [4 ]
Winterstein, Almut G. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, 1225 Ctr Dr,HPNP 3320 Bldg, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol HUTECH, Fac Pharm, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Coll Pharm, Gwang Ju, South Korea
[5] Univ Florida, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Safety CoDES, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[7] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
来源
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2020年 / 12卷
关键词
pregnancy; gestational age; live birth; stillbirth; abortion; ectopic; ICD-9; ICD-10; ORAL CLEFTS;
D O I
10.2147/CLEP.S269400
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Before October 2015, pregnancy cohorts assembled from US health insurance claims have relied on medical encounters with International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision-clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We aimed to extend existing pregnancy identification algorithms into the ICD-10-CM era and evaluate performance. Methods: We used national private insurance claims data (2005-2018) to develop and test a pregnancy identification algorithm. We considered validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes that identify medical encounters for live birth, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, abortions, and prenatal screening to identify pregnancies. We then mapped these codes to the ICD-10-CM system using general equivalent mapping tools and reconciled outputs with literature and expert opinion. Both versions were applied to the respective coding period to identify pregnancies. We required 45 weeks of health plan enrollment from estimated conception to ensure the capture of all pregnancy endpoints. Results: We identified 7,060,675 pregnancy episodes, of which 50.1% met insurance enrollment requirements. Live-born deliveries comprised the majority (76.5%) of episodes, followed by abortions (20.3%). The annual prevalence for all pregnancy types was stable across the ICD transition period except for postterm pregnancies, which increased from 0.5% to 3.4%. We observed that ICD codes indicating gestational age were available for 86.8% of live-born deliveries in the ICD-10 era compared to 23.5% in the ICD-9 era. Patterns of prenatal tests remained stable across the transition period. Conclusion: Translation of existing ICD-9-CM pregnancy algorithms into ICD-10-CM codes provided reasonable consistency in identifying pregnancy episodes across the ICD transition period. New codes for gestational age can potentially improve the precision of conception estimates and minimize measurement biases.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1138
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation of ICD-9 to ICD-10-CM Transition for Family Medicine: Simple or Convoluted?
    Grief, Samuel N.
    Patel, Jesal
    Kochendorfer, Karl M.
    Green, Lee A.
    Lussier, Yves A.
    Li, Jianrong
    Burton, Michael
    Boyd, Andrew D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [32] Understanding headache classification coding within the veterans health administration using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM in fiscal years 2014-2017
    Fodeh, Samah Jamal
    Fenton, Brenda T.
    Wang, Rixin
    Skanderson, Melissa
    Altalib, Hamada
    Kuruvilla, Deena
    Schindler, Emmanuelle
    Haskell, Sally
    Brandt, Cynthia
    Sico, Jason J.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [33] Elucidating Challenges and Opportunities in the Transition to ICD-10-CM
    Fiks, Alexander G.
    Grundmeier, Robert W.
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 (01) : 169 - 170
  • [34] The Transition to ICD-10-CM: Challenges for Pediatric Practice
    Caskey, Rachel
    Zaman, Jeffrey
    Nam, Hannah
    Chae, Sae-Rom
    Williams, Lauren
    Mathew, Gina
    Burton, Michael
    Li, Jiarong John
    Lussier, Yves A.
    Boyd, Andrew D.
    PEDIATRICS, 2014, 134 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [35] Impact of the ICD-10-CM transition on claims-based severe sepsis events among US medicare enrollees
    Woodworth, Tiffany S.
    Gallagher, Kerrin
    Gunnarsson, Erik
    Menzin, Joseph
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 312 - 312
  • [36] Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data
    Quan, HD
    Sundararajan, V
    Halfon, P
    Fong, A
    Burnand, B
    Luthi, JC
    Saunders, LD
    Beck, CA
    Feasby, TE
    Ghali, WA
    MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (11) : 1130 - 1139
  • [37] ICD-10-CM and the Risk of Re-Identification
    O'Neill, Liam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2015, 10 (01) : IV - VII
  • [38] Conversion of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality Indicators from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM/PCS: The Process, Results, and Implications for Users
    Utter, Garth H.
    Cox, Ginger L.
    Atolagbe, Oluseun O.
    Owens, Pamela L.
    Romano, Patrick S.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 53 (05) : 3704 - 3727
  • [39] Validation of ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Identification of Patients with Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke in a National Health Insurance Claims Database
    Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
    Huang, Kuo-Chang
    Hsieh, Cheng-Yang
    Tsai, Tzu-Tung
    Chen, Li-Ching
    Sung, Sheng-Feng
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 13 : 43 - 51
  • [40] The Impacts of ICD-10-CM on US Army Injury Surveillance
    Schuh-Renner, Anna
    Inscore, Matthew C.
    Hauschild, Veronique D.
    Jones, Bruce H.
    Canham-Chervak, Michelle
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 61 (01) : E45 - E50