Distribution of environmental performance in life cycle assessments-implications for environmental benchmarking

被引:10
|
作者
Welling, Sebastian [1 ]
Ryding, Sven-Olof [1 ]
机构
[1] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Valhallavagen 81, S-11427 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Benchmark; Environmental Product Declaration; Statistical analysis; Market distribution; Interpretation; Digitalisation;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-020-01852-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Life cycle assessment (LCA) is considered a robust method to analyse the environmental impacts of products and is used in public and private market applications such as Green Public Procurement (GPP) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Despite the usefulness of the methodology, difficulties exist with the interpretation of LCA results. The use of benchmarks can facilitate this process, but there is yet little research on the definition of environmental benchmarks. The aim of this paper is to analyse the distribution of environmental performance used for the definition of the benchmark and how it effects the use in selected product categories. Method LCA results from 54 Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) for insulation materials and 49 EPDs for bakery products are tested for their distribution. The outcome from the statistical analysis is used to compare and evaluate three calculation methods for a benchmark. Results and discussion The results of the study show that distributions and mid- and end-points of environmental performances of the studied indicators differ significantly for the two product categories. While some indicators for bakery products were closer to a normal distribution, most of the indicators are not normally distributed. This is reflected in the comparison of the chosen calculation methods for a benchmark, which showed that the distribution of the data affects the classification of the benchmark as well as the position of values on the benchmark. Conclusion The results emphasise that analysis of further product groups and the associated distribution of the environmental performance is needed to understand the implications of calculation methods on a benchmark. The availability of comparatively large datasets in a common structure is crucial for these analyses and can be facilitated through the digitalisation of LCA- and EPD-information. Furthermore, more research is needed on the communication formats for different benchmarking options, which must be applied for the different intended audiences to be effective.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 289
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle environmental impact assessments and comparisons of alternative fuels for clean vehicles
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 : 141 - 157
  • [32] Combining Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessments in Building Energy Renovation Projects
    Moschetti, Roberta
    Brattebo, Helge
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [33] Critical review on life cycle inventories and environmental assessments of LED-lamps
    Franz, Manuela
    Wenzl, Franz P.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 47 (21) : 2017 - 2078
  • [34] Life Cycle Assessment in environmental impact assessments of industrial projects: towards the improvement
    Zidoniene, Sigita
    Kruopiene, Jolita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 533 - 540
  • [35] Use of Life Cycle Assessments To Evaluate the Environmental Footprint of Contaminated Sediment Remediation
    Sparrevik, Magnus
    Saloranta, Tuomo
    Cornelissen, Gerard
    Eek, Espen
    Fet, Annik Magerholm
    Breedveld, Gijs D.
    Linkov, Igor
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (10) : 4235 - 4241
  • [36] Environmental effect evaluation of refrigerator cycle with life cycle climate performance
    Choi, Seyoung
    Jung, Yujun
    Kim, Yonghan
    Lee, Hoseong
    Hwang, Yunho
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION, 2021, 122 : 134 - 146
  • [37] Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications
    Scheuer, C
    Keoleian, GA
    Reppe, P
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2003, 35 (10) : 1049 - 1064
  • [38] Benchmarking environmental and economic impacts from the HSR networks considering life cycle perspectives
    Rungskunroch, Panrawee
    Shen, Zuo-Jun
    Kaewunruen, Sakdirat
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 90
  • [39] Consideration of environmental change in performance assessments
    Pinedo, P
    Thorne, M
    Egan, M
    Calvez, M
    Kautsky, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 185 - 209
  • [40] Environmental life cycle analysis
    Walter Klüpffer
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3 (5) : 280 - 280