How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?

被引:12
|
作者
Vederhus, John-Kare [1 ]
Kristensen, Oistein [1 ]
Timko, Christine [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sorlandet Hosp HF, Addict Unit, PB 416, N-4604 Kristiansand, Norway
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Innovat Implementat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Substance use disorders; Affected family member; Quality of life; Family functioning; Codependency; Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis; Norway; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; TESTING MEASUREMENT; MENTAL-HEALTH; FIT INDEXES; EQUIVALENCE; COVARIANCE; VALIDATION; ALCOHOL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-019-02169-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Addiction is a major health stressor for families, representing an under-researched area with important policy implications. The current aim was to validate the Composite Codependency Scale, which captures the psychological characteristics of affected family members, and assess quality of life as mediated by family functioning. Methods Close relatives (n = 271) of patients in treatment for substance use disorder (SUD) participated in a 4-day psychoeducational program. We also recruited a general population sample (n = 393) via an online social media site. Data were analyzed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) and a latent regression model. Differences in subscale latent means were applied to ascertain how the scale discriminated the two populations. Results MGCFA yielded a shortened, nine-item partial scalar invariant scale (SCCS) that allowed comparison of latent means. The SCCS discriminated between family members and the general population, with family scoring higher on all three scale dimensions. By effect size, family had higher means (mean differences; 95% confidence intervals) for 'emotional suppression' (0.48; 0.36-0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.92), 'interpersonal control' (0.47; 0.36-0.59; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.97), and 'self-sacrifice' (0.20; 0.10-0.29; p < 0.001; effect size, 0.43). Higher SCCS scores were associated with greater family dysfunction (beta = 1.00, 95% CI 0.63-1.36; p < 0.001) and worse quality of life (beta = -0.23, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.16; p < 0.001), confirming the concurrent validity of the SCCS. Conclusion When family members of people with addictions had the psychological characteristics of suppressing their emotions, believing they could fix others' problems, and neglecting their own for others' needs, they also had more family dysfunction and poorer quality of life. The SCCS offers a valid instrument for addressing the life situation of affected families. This scale can help clinicians focus on family members within health services, especially within SUD treatment services.
引用
收藏
页码:2161 / 2170
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of life of uveal melanoma survivors and their family members
    Rosenne, Hadas
    Frenkel, Shahar
    Hendler, Keren
    Baruch, Ronen
    Pe'er, Jacob
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 17 : S299 - S299
  • [32] Pharmacotherapy in schizophrenic patients and quality of life of their family members
    Trajanovic, L.
    Skakic, O.
    Zikic, O.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 16 : S372 - S373
  • [33] Quality of life for people caring for family members with disabilities
    Michalik, Jan
    5TH ICEEPSY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 171 : 458 - 464
  • [34] QUALITY OF LIFE AND CHALLENGES OF FAMILY MEMBERS OF CHILDREN WITH MENINGOMYELOCELE
    Buoro, Rodrigo Santos
    Nogueira, Monica Paschoal
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 28 (06): : 291 - 295
  • [35] Characteristics and quality of life of substance users and their caregivers
    Maksimovic, Jadranka M.
    Sbutega, Olivera B.
    Pavlovic, Aleksandar D.
    Vlajinac, Hristina D.
    Kavecan, Ivana I.
    Vujcic, Isidora S.
    Sipetic, Sandra B. Grujicic
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (31) : E29699
  • [36] How affected family members communicate about their loved one's non-medical opioid use
    Brown, Suzanne
    O'Shay, Sydney
    Pasman, Emily
    Hicks, Danielle
    Agius, Elizabeth
    Resko, Stella M.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2024, 41 (01) : 180 - 199
  • [37] How do family caregivers of older adults with dementia perceive the meaning of quality of life?
    Hazzan, Afeez
    Dauenhauer, Jason
    Heffernan, Kristin
    Hazzan, Joyce
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S77 - S77
  • [38] Quality of life assessment in palliative care: How do family caregivers interpret the items?
    Taylor, Genevieve
    Cohen, S. Robin
    Carpentier, Stephanie
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2006, 22 (03) : 240 - 240
  • [39] Prefrontal Cortex Functioning of Family Members of Those with a Substance Use Disorder
    Shumway, Sterling T.
    Bradshaw, Spencer D.
    Hayes, Nicholas
    Schonian, Sarah
    Kimball, Thomas G.
    ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY, 2019, 37 (01) : 75 - 98
  • [40] Family Members’ Experiences: People with Comorbid Bipolar and Substance Use Disorder
    Uwarren September
    Anna-Marie Beytell
    International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2019, 17 : 1162 - 1179