Development of measurable indicators to enhance public health evidence-informed policy-making

被引:20
|
作者
Tudisca, Valentina [1 ]
Valente, Adriana [1 ]
Castellani, Tommaso [1 ]
Stahl, Timo [2 ]
Sandu, Petru [3 ]
Dulf, Diana [3 ]
Spitters, Hilde [4 ]
Van de Goor, Ien [4 ]
Radl-Karimi, Christina [5 ]
Syed, Mohamed Ahmed [6 ]
Loncarevic, Natasa [5 ]
Lau, Cathrine Juel [7 ]
Roelofs, Susan [8 ]
Bertram, Maja [5 ]
Edwards, Nancy [8 ]
Aro, Arja R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy CNR, Rome, Italy
[2] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf THL, Tampere, Finland
[3] BBU, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tranzo, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Univ Southern Denmark SDU, Unit Hlth Promot Res, Odense, Denmark
[6] Primary Hlth Care Corp, Doha, Qatar
[7] Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Ctr Clin Res & Dis Prevent, RCPH, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Ottawa Univ uOttawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
Evidence-informed policy-making; indicators; physical activity; Delphi methodology; co-production of knowledge; public health; DECISION-MAKING; RESEARCH KNOWLEDGE; SERVICES RESEARCH; SUPPORT TOOLS; DELPHI METHOD; CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONS; SCIENCE; DETERMINANTS; PARTNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-018-0323-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ensuring health policies are informed by evidence still remains a challenge despite efforts devoted to this aim. Several tools and approaches aimed at fostering evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) have been developed, yet there is a lack of availability of indicators specifically devoted to assess and support EIPM. The present study aims to overcome this by building a set of measurable indicators for EIPM intended to infer if and to what extent health-related policies are, or are expected to be, evidence-informed for the purposes of policy planning as well as formative and summative evaluations. Methods: The indicators for EIPM were developed and validated at international level by means of a two-round internet-based Delphi study conducted within the European project 'REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity' (REPOPA). A total of 82 researchers and policy-makers from the six European countries (Denmark, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania, the United Kingdom) involved in the project and international organisations were asked to evaluate the relevance and feasibility of an initial set of 23 indicators developed by REPOPA researchers on the basis of literature and knowledge gathered from the previous phases of the project, and to propose new indicators. Results: The first Delphi round led to the validation of 14 initial indicators and to the development of 8 additional indicators based on panellists' suggestions; the second round led to the validation of a further 11 indicators, including 6 proposed by panellists, and to the rejection of 6 indicators. A total of 25 indicators were validated, covering EIPM issues related to human resources, documentation, participation and monitoring, and stressing different levels of knowledge exchange and involvement of researchers and other stakeholders in policy development and evaluation. Conclusion: The study overcame the lack of availability of indicators to assess if and to what extent policies are realised in an evidence-informed manner thanks to the active contribution of researchers and policy-makers. These indicators are intended to become a shared resource usable by policy-makers, researchers and other stakeholders, with a crucial impact on fostering the development of policies informed by evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Transparent Process for "Evidence-Informed" Policy Making
    Dicks, Lynn V.
    Hodge, Ian
    Randall, Nicola P.
    Scharlemann, Joern P. W.
    Siriwardena, Gavin M.
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Smith, Rebecca K.
    Sutherland, William J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (02): : 119 - 125
  • [42] Toward More "Evidence-Informed" Policy Making?
    Head, Brian W.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (03) : 472 - U22
  • [43] The making of evidence-informed health policy in Cambodia: knowledge, institutions and processes
    Liverani, Marco
    Chheng, Kannarath
    Parkhurst, Justin
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (03):
  • [44] Building capacity for evidence-informed decision making in Canadian public health
    Maureen Dobbins
    Robyn Traynor
    Lori Greco
    [J]. Implementation Science, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [45] Working towards evidence-informed policy: Public health report Stockholm
    Bartelink, V.
    Mendez, D. Yacaman
    Lager, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [46] Qualitative assessment of opportunities and challenges to improve evidence-informed health policy-making in Hungary – an EVIPNet situation analysis pilot
    Péter Mihalicza
    Mark Leys
    Ilona Borbás
    Szabolcs Szigeti
    Olivia Biermann
    Tanja Kuchenmüller
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [47] Qualitative assessment of opportunities and challenges to improve evidence-informed health policy-making in Hungary - an EVIPNet situation analysis pilot
    Mihalicza, Peter
    Leys, Mark
    Borbas, Ilona
    Szigeti, Szabolcs
    Biermann, Olivia
    Kuchenmuller, Tanja
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [48] Participants’ perceptions of a knowledge-brokering strategy to facilitate evidence-informed policy-making in Fiji
    Gade Waqa
    Helen Mavoa
    Wendy Snowdon
    Marj Moodie
    Rigieta Nadakuitavuki
    Marita Mc Cabe
    Boyd Swinburn
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 13
  • [49] Participants' perceptions of a knowledge-brokering strategy to facilitate evidence-informed policy-making in Fiji
    Waqa, Gade
    Mavoa, Helen
    Snowdon, Wendy
    Moodie, Marj
    Nadakuitavuki, Rigieta
    Mc Cabe, Marita
    Swinburn, Boyd
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [50] Improving evidence informed policy-making for health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
    Rashidian, Arash
    Mandil, Ahmed
    Mahjour, Jaouad
    [J]. EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (12) : 793 - 794