Unsupervised machine and deep learning methods for structural damage detection: A comparative study

被引:26
|
作者
Wang, Zilong [1 ]
Cha, Young-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Inst Bldg Sci Grp, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Civil Engn, SP-427,EITC,15 Gillson St, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
deep learning; fast clustering; machine-learning; structural damage detection; unsupervised novelty detection; NOVELTY DETECTION; ALGORITHM; DIMENSIONALITY; IDENTIFICATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/eng2.12551
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While many structural damage detection methods have been developed in recent decades, few data-driven methods in unsupervised learning mode have been developed to solve the practical difficulties in data acquisition for civil infrastructures in different scenarios. To address such a challenge, this article proposes a number of improved unsupervised novelty detection methods and conducts extensive comparative studies on a laboratory scale steel bridge to examine their performances of damage detection. The key concept behind unsupervised novelty detection in this article is that only normal data from undamaged/baseline structural scenarios are required to train statistical models with these methods. Then, these trained models are used to identify abnormal testing data from damaged scenarios. To detect structural damage in the form of loosening bolts in the steel bridge, four machine-learning methods (i.e., K-nearest neighbors method, Gaussian mixture models, one-class support vector machines, density peaks-based fast clustering method) and one deep learning method using a deep auto-encoder are selected. Meanwhile, some modifications and improvements are made to enable these methods to detect structural damage in unsupervised novelty detection mode. In their comparative studies, the advantages and disadvantages of these methods are analyzed based on their results of structural damage detection.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A novel comparative study for detection of Covid-19 on CT lung images using texture analysis, machine learning, and deep learning methods
    Huseyin Yasar
    Murat Ceylan
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80 : 5423 - 5447
  • [42] A novel comparative study for detection of Covid-19 on CT lung images using texture analysis, machine learning, and deep learning methods
    Yasar, Huseyin
    Ceylan, Murat
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 80 (04) : 5423 - 5447
  • [43] Unsupervised deep learning approach for structural anomaly detection using probabilistic features
    Wan, Hua-Ping
    Zhu, Yi-Kai
    Luo, Yaozhi
    Todd, Michael D.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2025, 24 (01): : 3 - 33
  • [44] Litter Detection with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
    Cordova, Manuel
    Pinto, Allan
    Hellevik, Christina Carrozzo
    Alaliyat, Saleh Abdel-Afou
    Hameed, Ibrahim A.
    Pedrini, Helio
    Torres, Ricardo da S.
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (02)
  • [45] A comparative analysis of unsupervised machine-learning methods in PSG-related phenotyping
    Ghorvei, Mohammadreza
    Karhu, Tuomas
    Hietakoste, Salla
    Ferreira-Santos, Daniela
    Hrubos-Strom, Harald
    Islind, Anna Sigridur
    Biedebach, Luka
    Nikkonen, Sami
    Leppaenen, Timo
    Rusanen, Matias
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [46] Exhaustive Study into Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Multilingual Cyberbullying Detection in Bangla and Chittagonian Texts
    Mahmud, Tanjim
    Ptaszynski, Michal
    Masui, Fumito
    ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [47] Comparative approach on crop detection using machine learning and deep learning techniques
    Nithya, V.
    Josephine, M. S.
    Jeyabalaraja, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (09) : 4636 - 4648
  • [48] Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structural Health Monitoring
    Boccagna, Roberto
    Bottini, Maurizio
    Petracca, Massimo
    Amelio, Alessia
    Camata, Guido
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [49] A comparative study of machine learning methods for authorship attribution
    Jockers, Matthew L.
    Witten, Daniela M.
    LITERARY AND LINGUISTIC COMPUTING, 2010, 25 (02): : 215 - 223
  • [50] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Persistence Diagrams
    Barnes, Danielle
    Polanco, Luis
    Perea, Jose A.
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 4