Validation of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in an Iranian population

被引:24
|
作者
Bidari, Ali [1 ,2 ]
Hassanzadeh, Morteza [3 ]
Parsa, Banafsheh Ghavidel [4 ]
Kianmehr, Nahid [1 ]
Kabir, Ali [5 ,6 ]
Pirhadi, Sara [7 ]
Sayfi, Mohammad [8 ]
Toutounchi, Mehrangiz [9 ]
Fattahi, Fariba [9 ]
Karimi, Fereidoon Zandi [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Rheumatol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Hazarat E Rasool Akram Med Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Razi Hosp, Rheumatol Res Ctr, Sch Med, Rasht, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Ctr Educ Res Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[7] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[8] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Dept Internal Med, Rasht, Iran
[9] Acad Ctr Educ Culture & Res ACECR, Iranian Ctr Med Laser ICML, Med Laser Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Fibromyalgia; American College of Rheumatology criteria; Validation studies; Iran; SYMPTOM SEVERITY; MUSCLE PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-013-2829-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary criteria for fibromyalgia (FM) in an Iranian population. In this multicenter prospective study, we enrolled 168 FM patients and 110 controls. All participants underwent dolorimetry examination by study assessors and completed a questionnaire containing variables of both the ACR 2010 preliminary and ACR 1990 criteria. We compared the performance of the ACR 2010 criteria with the expert diagnosis as well as the ACR 1990 criteria. Receiver operator characteristic analyses and Youden index were used to evaluate the test characteristics of a set of different cutoff points for two subcomponents of ACR 2010 criteria including widespread pain index (WPI) and symptom severity (SS) scale. Considering expert diagnosis as the gold standard, the ACR 2010 criteria showed comparable specificity with ACR 1990 (92.8 vs. 88.3 %, P = 0.073), but lower sensitivity (58.9 vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.003) and a tendency for lower accuracy (72.4 vs. 78.4 %, P = 0.105). Applying the ACR 1990 criteria as the gold standard, we observed a trend toward an increase in overall accuracy (72.4 vs. 79.1 %, P = 0.064). Optimal test characteristics were achieved for WPI a parts per thousand yen6 and SS scale score a parts per thousand yen4 and improved sensitivity and accuracy of ACR 2010 criteria when compared to expert, 76.1 and 81.7, respectively. The preliminary ACR 2010 criteria performed less desirably in terms of sensitivity in our set of Iranian patients. Selecting lower cutoff points as WPI a parts per thousand yen6 and SS scale score a parts per thousand yen4 improved the diagnostic values of the criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:2999 / 3007
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] WOKE UP STIFF - A MNEMONIC FOR THE AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF FIBROMYALGIA
    DISLA, E
    TARANTA, A
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1992, 35 (03): : 366 - 366
  • [42] Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology Criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Criteria in Patients with Established Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Hemmati, Iman
    Goycochea-Robbles, Maria Victoria
    Sayre, Eric C.
    Lacaille, Diane
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S49 - S50
  • [43] Fibromyalgia: Where are we a decade after the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria were developed?
    Crofford, LJ
    Clauw, DJ
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (05): : 1136 - 1138
  • [44] The Michigan Body Map and Its Use in Assessing the American College of Rheumatology Survey Criteria for Fibromyalgia
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Hassett, Afton L.
    Brummett, Katherine A.
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Williams, David A.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S368 - S368
  • [45] Fibromyalgia with chronic rheumatic diseases in South Korea: a comparison of clinical and American College of Rheumatology criteria
    Choi, Hyo Jin
    Han, Jung Yoon
    Seo, Mi Ryoung
    Ryu, Hee Jung
    Baek, Han Joo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (12) : 1922 - 1926
  • [46] Validation of the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis
    Tomelleri, Alessandro
    Padoan, Roberto
    Kavadichanda, Chengappa G.
    Jose, Augustine
    Singh, Kritika
    Iorio, Luca
    Rathore, Upendra
    Rinaldi, Emma
    Baldissera, Elena
    Agarwal, Vikas
    Dagna, Lorenzo
    Campochiaro, Corrado
    Misra, Durga Prasanna
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 62 (10) : 3427 - 3432
  • [47] Reliability, Factor Structure and Predictive Validity of the Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Scales of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria of Fibromyalgia
    Galvez-Sanchez, Carmen M.
    de la Coba, Pablo
    Duschek, Stefan
    Reyes del Paso, Gustavo A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 17
  • [48] American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of vasculitis
    Gelfand, SG
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 130 (10) : 861 - 861
  • [49] Validation of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria in the Pediatric Population
    Bar, Daniel
    Niznik, Stanley
    Spielman, Shiri
    Semo-Oz, Rotem
    Barg, Assaf
    Levy-Mendelovich, Sarina
    Kenet, Gili
    Agmon-Levin, Nancy
    Tirosh, Irit
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 76 : 229 - 230
  • [50] PLANNING FIBROMYALGIA SERVICES: CAN THE 2010 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY CRITERIA DELIVER AS A PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE EXPERIENCES IN A NEW PATIENT COHORT?
    Bateman, James
    Levasseur, Kirsty
    Hirsch, George
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 : 208 - 208