Slow versus rapid maxillary expansion in bilateral cleft lip and palate: a CBCT randomized clinical trial

被引:27
|
作者
de Almeida, Araci Malagodi [1 ]
Ozawa, Terumi Okada [1 ]
de Medeiros Alves, Arthur Cesar [2 ]
Janson, Guilherme [2 ]
Pereira Lauris, Jose Roberto [3 ]
Yatabe Ioshida, Marilia Sayako [2 ]
Garib, Daniela Gamba [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Rua Silvio Marchione 3-20,Vila Nova Cidade Univ, BR-17012900 Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Alameda Doutor Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Pediat Dent Orthodont & Community Hlth, Bauru Dent Sch, Alameda Doutor Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Sao Paulo, Bauru, Brazil
关键词
Palatal expansion technique; Cone-beam computed tomography; Cleft lip; Cleft palate; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FACIAL GROWTH; EXPANDERS; IMMEDIATE; SKELETAL; HYRAX; ARCH; HAAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-016-1943-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this "two-arm parallel" trial was to compare the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of slow (SME) and rapid (RME) maxillary expansions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Forty-six patients with BCLP and maxillary arch constriction in the late mixed dentition were randomly and equally allocated into two groups. Computer-generated randomization was used. Allocation was concealed with sequentially, numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. The SME and RME groups comprised patients treated with quad-helix and Haas/Hyrax-type expanders, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before expansion and 4 to 6 months post-expansion. Nasal cavity width, maxillary width, alveolar crest width, arch width, palatal cleft width, inclination of posterior teeth, alveolar crest level, and buccal and lingual bone plate thickness were assessed. Blinding was applicable for outcome assessment only. Interphase and intergroup comparisons were performed using paired t tests and t tests, respectively (p < 0.05). SME and RME similarly promoted significant increase in all the maxillary transverse dimensions at molar and premolar regions with a decreasing expanding effect from the dental arch to the nasal cavity. Palatal cleft width had a significant increase in both groups. Significant buccal inclination of posterior teeth was only observed for RME. Additionally, both expansion procedures promoted a slight reduction of the alveolar crest level and the buccal bone plate thickness. No difference was found between the orthopedic, dental, and alveolar bone plate changes of SME and RME in children with BCLP. Both appliances produced significant skeletal transverse gains with negligible periodontal bone changes. Treatment time for SME, however, was longer than the observed for RME. SME and RME can be similarly indicated to correct maxillary arch constriction in patients with BCLP in the mixed dentition.
引用
收藏
页码:1789 / 1799
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rapid palatal expansion in a patient with cleft lip and palate
    Katti, Chandrika G.
    Talapaneni, Ashok Kumar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (03) : 430 - 430
  • [22] Prognosis of Maxillary Central Incisors in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip/Palate
    Green, Mark A. A.
    Ritchie, Collin
    Flanagan, Sarah
    Nuzzi, Laura
    Padwa, Bonnie L. L.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024, 61 (09): : 1543 - 1547
  • [23] Buccal bone changes after rapid maxillary expansion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate Response
    Cardinal, Lucas
    Zimermann, Gabriela da Rosa
    Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
    Andrade, Ildeu, Jr.
    Oliveira, Dauro Douglas
    Dominguez, Gladys Cristina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 162 (05) : E216 - E217
  • [24] Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block versus palatal block for cleft palate repair in children: A randomized controlled trial
    Abu Elyazed, Mohamed M.
    Mostafa, Shaimaa F.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 34 (03) : 83 - 88
  • [25] Soft Tissue Changes From Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Chua, Hannah Daile P.
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (07) : 1648 - 1658
  • [26] Effect of Maxillary Expansion on the Maxillary Arch Width in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Palate: A Review
    Alkadhi, Omar H.
    Alotaibi, Lamis Hejab
    Alrashoud, Rowaida R.
    Almutairi, Mohammed Hamad
    Al Matar, Huda Ali
    Mallineni, Sreekanth Kumar
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2023, 10 (05):
  • [27] A possible otological complication due to maxillary expansion in a cleft lip and palate patient
    Aizenbud, D
    Hefer, T
    Rachmiel, A
    Figueroa, AA
    Joachims, HZ
    Laufer, D
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (04): : 416 - 420
  • [28] Maxillary expansion using bone distraction technique in cleft lip and palate patients
    Iino, S
    Kuroe, K
    Ogura, M
    Shomura, K
    Okubo, A
    Sugihara, K
    Ito, G
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1999, : 379 - 382
  • [29] Maxillary expansion using transpalatal distraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    Verdeja, Raul
    Herzog, Georges
    Jaques, Bertrand
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 119 (07) : 2200 - 2205
  • [30] Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Seo, Jihee
    Kim, Sukwha
    Yang, Il-Hyung
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (07) : 2128 - 2132