A critical item analysis of the QABF: Development of a short form assessment instrument

被引:23
|
作者
Singh, Ashvind N. [1 ]
Matson, Johnny L. [2 ]
Mouttapa, Michelle [3 ]
Pella, Russell D. [2 ]
Hill, B. D. [4 ]
Thorson, Ryan [2 ]
机构
[1] Metropolitan State Hosp, Norwalk, CA 90650 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
BEHAVIORAL FUNCTION QABF; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; MENTAL-ILLNESS; SELF-INJURY; QUESTIONS; MAINTENANCE; RELIABILITY; CHECKLIST; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2008.11.001
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Due to the relative inability of individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) to provide an accurate and reliable self-report, assessment in this population is more difficult than with individuals in the general population. As a result, assessment procedures must be adjusted to compensate for the relative lack of information that the individual may be able to provide and rely more on the behavioral expression of communication. One method commonly used is the indirect functional assessment that utilizes behavior rating scales developed to gather behavioral data in a short time. One of the few empirically derived and psychometrically sound scales is the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), a 25-item questionnaire designed to rate specific behavioral functions and maintaining variables. The purpose of this study was to use both exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic procedures to examine the psychometric properties of the QABF, conduct an item analysis, and determine if a short form version could be developed that is both psychometrically valid and reliable, and clinically useful. Results of the item selection procedure indicated that the original 25 items could be reduced to 15. Evaluation of the 15-item short form showed that the QABF-SF maintained the original five-factor structure of the original form, while maintaining an equivalent degree of reliability and validity. The QABF-SF appears to be a useful tool to aid clinicians in the brief functional assessment of behavior in individuals with ID. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 792
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Construct-driven assessment: Item development and analysis
    Pellegrino, JW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 36 - 36
  • [23] Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire
    Amy C. Lang
    Rachel L. Ankney
    Kristoffer S. Berlin
    W. Hobart Davies
    Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2022, 31 : 507 - 517
  • [24] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a 10-Item Short Form Inventory of Gambling Situations
    Caitlin Smith
    Sherry H. Stewart
    Roisin M. O’Connor
    Pamela Collins
    Joel Katz
    Journal of Gambling Studies, 2011, 27 : 115 - 128
  • [25] Development of a 21-Item Short Form of the Attitudes to Sexual Offenders (ATS) Scale
    Hogue, Todd E.
    Harper, Craig A.
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2019, 43 (01) : 117 - 130
  • [26] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a 10-Item Short Form Inventory of Gambling Situations
    Smith, Caitlin
    Stewart, Sherry H.
    O'Connor, Roisin M.
    Collins, Pamela
    Katz, Joel
    JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2011, 27 (01) : 115 - 128
  • [27] Development and Validation of 18-Item Short Form for the Parents as Social Context Questionnaire
    Lang, Amy C.
    Ankney, Rachel L.
    Berlin, Kristoffer S.
    Davies, W. Hobart
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2022, 31 (02) : 507 - 517
  • [28] Item Response Theory in Scale Development Research: A Critical Analysis
    Whittaker, Tiffany A.
    Worthington, Roger L.
    COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 44 (02): : 216 - 225
  • [29] A Critical Analysis of the WAQ: The Development of a Korean Form
    Kang, Sudol
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2021, 124 (05) : 2327 - 2355
  • [30] Validation of the short assessment of health literacy (SAHL-D) and short-form development: Rasch analysis
    A. J. Woudstra
    C. S. Meppelink
    H. Pander Maat
    J. Oosterhaven
    M. P. Fransen
    A. L. Dima
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19