Traversing myths and mountains: addressing socioeconomic inequities in the promotion of nutrition and physical activity behaviours

被引:54
|
作者
Ball, Kylie [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Phys Activ & Nutr Res, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Socioeconomic disadvantage; Inequities; Inequalities; Interventions; DISADVANTAGED WOMEN; SEDENTARY BEHAVIOR; DIETARY BEHAVIORS; FOOD; INTERVENTIONS; OBESITY; HEALTH; ADULTS; YOUTH; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12966-015-0303-4
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: In developed countries, individuals experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage - whether a low education level, low income, low-status occupation, or living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhood are less likely than those more advantaged to engage in eating and physical activity behaviours conducive to optimal health. These socioeconomic inequities in nutrition and physical activity (and some sedentary) behaviours are graded, persistent, and evident across multiple populations and studies. They are concerning in that they mirror socioeconomic inequities in obesity and in health outcomes. Yet there remains a dearth of evidence of the most effective means of addressing these inequities. People experiencing disadvantage face multiple challenges to healthy behaviours that can appear insurmountable. With increasing recognition of the role of underlying structural and societal factors as determinants of nutrition and physical activity behaviours and inequities in these behaviours, and the limited success of behaviour change approaches in addressing these inequities, we might wonder whether there remains a role for behavioural scientists to tackle these challenges. Discussion: This debate piece argues that behavioural scientists can play an important role in addressing socioeconomic inequities in nutrition, physical activity and sedentary behaviours, and that this will involve challenging myths and taking on new perspectives. There are successful models for doing so from which we can learn. Summary: Addressing socioeconomic inequities in eating, physical activity and sedentary behaviours is challenging. However, successful examples demonstrate that overcoming such challenges is possible, and provide guidance for doing so. Given the disproportionate burden of ill health carried by people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, all our nutrition and physical activity interventions, programs and policies should be designed to reach and positively impact these individuals at greatest need.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Promotion of Healthy Nutrition and Physical Activity Lifestyles for Teenagers: A Systematic Literature Review of The Current Methodologies
    Villasana, Maria Vanessa
    Pires, Ivan Miguel
    Sa, Juliana
    Garcia, Nuno M.
    Zdravevski, Eftim
    Chorbev, Ivan
    Lameski, Petre
    Florez-Revuelta, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [42] Researching Those Who Have the Most to Gain: Focused Physical Activity Promotion in Lower Socioeconomic Populations
    Rebecca E. Lee
    Heather J. Adamus-Leach
    Kyle C. Cheung
    Erica G. Soltero
    Ygnacio Lopez
    Fiorella Saavedra
    Munazza Noor
    Scherezade K. Mama
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2012, 6 (4) : 355 - 361
  • [43] Researching Those Who Have the Most to Gain: Focused Physical Activity Promotion in Lower Socioeconomic Populations
    Lee, Rebecca E.
    Adamus-Leach, Heather J.
    Cheung, Kyle C.
    Soltero, Erica G.
    Lopez, Ygnacio, III
    Saavedra, Fiorella
    Noor, Munazza
    Mama, Scherezade K.
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS, 2012, 6 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [44] The Effectiveness of Tailored Interactive Multimedia Software based on the Trans-Theoretical Model for the Promotion of Physical Activity Behaviours
    Jalali, Somayeh
    Roozbahani, Nasrin
    Shamsi, Mohsen
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (04): : 140 - 151
  • [45] Do socioeconomic inequities arise during school-based physical activity interventions? An exploratory case study of the GoActive trial
    Alliott, Olivia
    Fairbrother, Hannah
    Corder, Kirsten
    Wilkinson, Paul
    van Sluijs, Esther
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [46] Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity
    Gelius, Peter
    Messing, Sven
    Tcymbal, Antonina
    Whiting, Stephen
    Breda, Joao
    Abu-Omar, Karim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (09) : 1863 - 1873
  • [47] The Effect of an 8-week Health Promotion Program on Nutrition and Physical Activity in Young Minority Girls
    Poudevigne, Melanie
    Sabatier, Manning
    Marshall, Kathy
    Jones, Kristen
    Jenkins, Cynthia
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (05): : 76 - 77
  • [48] Design of the Equity in Prevention and Progression of Hypertension by Addressing Barriers to Nutrition and Physical Activity Study: A Cluster Randomized Trial
    Hardy, Shakia T.
    Hannon, Lonnie
    Hall, Lanisha
    Cherrington, Andrea L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 36 (05) : 248 - 255
  • [49] Interrelations of Socioeconomic Position and Occupational and Leisure-Time Physical Activity in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    Wolin, Kathleen Y.
    Bennett, Gary G.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2008, 5 (02): : 229 - 241
  • [50] Health promotion for people with intellectual disabilities: An inventory of available nutrition and physical activity initiatives in two service providers
    Kuijken, N.
    Naaldenberg, J.
    Vlot-van Anrooij, K.
    Nijhuis-van der Sanden, R.
    Lantman-de Valk, H. van Schrojenstein
    Leusink, G.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (7-8) : 692 - 692