Is Wearable Technology Becoming Part of Us? Developing and Validating a Measurement Scale for Wearable Technology Embodiment

被引:13
|
作者
Nelson, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
Verhagen, Tibert [2 ]
Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam [1 ,3 ]
Noordzij, Matthijs L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Biomed Signals & Syst, POB 217, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Market Insights, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ziekenhuis Grp Twente, Almelo, Netherlands
[4] Univ Twente, Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH | 2019年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
embodiment; wearable technology; measurement development; human technology interaction; eHealth; mHealth; wearable electronic devices; self-help devices; health information technology; medical informatics; MODEL; SATISFACTION; SENSORS; ANTECEDENTS; ACCEPTANCE; ENGAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; SYSTEMS; SAMPLES; MIS;
D O I
10.2196/12771
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To experience external objects in such a way that they are perceived as an integral part of one's own body is called embodiment. Wearable technology is a category of objects, which, due to its intrinsic properties (eg, close to the body, inviting frequent interaction, and access to personal information), is likely to be embodied. This phenomenon, which is referred to in this paper as wearable technology embodiment, has led to extensive conceptual considerations in various research fields. These considerations and further possibilities with regard to quantifying wearable technology embodiment are of particular value to the mobile health (mHealth) field. For example, the ability to predict the effectiveness of mHealth interventions and knowing the extent to which people embody the technology might be crucial for improving mHealth adherence. To facilitate examining wearable technology embodiment, we developed a measurement scale for this construct. Objective: This study aimed to conceptualize wearable technology embodiment, create an instrument to measure it, and test the predictive validity of the scale using well-known constructs related to technology adoption. The introduced instrument has 3 dimensions and includes 9 measurement items. The items are distributed evenly between the 3 dimensions, which include body extension, cognitive extension, and self-extension. Methods: Data were collected through a vignette based survey (n=182). Each respondent was given 3 different vignettes, describing a hypothetical situation using a different type of wearable technology (a smart phone, a smart wristband, or a smart watch) with the purpose of tracking daily activities. Scale dimensions and item reliability were tested for their validity and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI). Results: Convergent validity of the 3 dimensions and their reliability were established as confirmatory factor analysis factor loadings (>0.70), average variance extracted values (>0.50), and minimum item to total correlations (>0.40) exceeded established threshold values. The reliability of the dimensions was also confirmed as Cronbach alpha and composite reliability exceeded 0.70. GFI testing confirmed that the 3 dimensions function as intercorrelated first-order factors. Predictive validity testing showed that these dimensions significantly add to multiple constructs associated with predicting the adoption of new technologies (ie, trust, perceived usefulness, involvement, attitude, and continuous intention). Conclusions: The wearable technology embodiment measurement instrument has shown promise as a tool to measure the extension of an individual's body, cognition, and self, as well as predict certain aspects of technology adoption. This 3-dimensional instrument can be applied to mixed method research and used by wearable technology developers to improve future versions through such things as fit, improved accuracy of biofeedback data, and customizable features or fashion to connect to the users' personal identity. Further research is recommended to apply this measurement instrument to multiple scenarios and technologies, and more diverse user groups.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY AND ASD: A REVIEW
    Seeber, Richard E., II
    Spieler, Gabriel S.
    Moon, Sun J.
    Kim, Jung W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (10): : S157 - S158
  • [32] Wearable Orofacial Technology and Orthodontics
    Prasad, Sabarinath
    Arunachalam, Sivakumar
    Boillat, Thomas
    Ghoneima, Ahmed
    Gandedkar, Narayan
    Diar-Bakirly, Samira
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [33] Transforming industries with wearable technology
    Lovati, Stefano
    Electronic Products, 2024, 66 (01): : 8 - 10
  • [34] Wearable Technology, Privacy Issues
    Saa, Pablo
    Moscoso-Zea, Oswaldo
    Lujan-Mora, Sergio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS (ICITS 2018), 2018, 721 : 517 - 526
  • [35] Clinical Applications of Wearable Technology
    Bonato, Paolo
    2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, : 6580 - 6583
  • [36] Printed electronics, wearable technology
    Gruner, George
    TRANSLATIONAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2016, 3 (03):
  • [37] The Foreseeable Future of Wearable Technology
    Harvey, Richard
    APPLIED PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOFEEDBACK, 2018, 43 (01) : 97 - 97
  • [38] Smart clothes and wearable technology
    Smith, David
    AI & SOCIETY, 2007, 22 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [39] Legal Issues with Wearable Technology
    Gaff, Brian M.
    COMPUTER, 2015, 48 (09) : 10 - 12
  • [40] Designing Wearable Technology for Opera
    Hartman, Kate
    Puckett, Nick
    Tindale, Adam
    DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DIS 2023, 2023, : 1411 - 1423