Detection of inv(16) and t(16;16) by fluorescence in situ hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia M4Eo

被引:0
|
作者
Hernández, JM
González, MB
Granada, I
Gutiérrez, N
Chillón, C
Ramos, F
Ribera, JM
González, M
Feliu, E
San Miguel, J
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Salamanca, Serv Hematol, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Salamanca, CSIC, Ctr Invest Canc, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain
[3] Univ Badalona, Hosp Germans Trias & Pujol, Badalona, Spain
[4] Hosp Virgen Blanca, Serv Hematol, Leon, Spain
关键词
cytogeneetics; FISH; RT-PCR; inv(16); t(16; 16); CBFB-MYH11; acute myeloblastic leukemia; M4Eo;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. It has been established that cytogenetic findings at the time of diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are powerful prognostic indicators. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 and translocation t(16;16) resulting in chimeric fusion of CBFB and MYH11 genes are typically seen in the M4-Eo FAB classification subset of AML and are associated with low-risk disease. These subtle chromosomal abnormalities may be difficult to detect in poor-quality metaphase preparations and if missed could lead to incorrect assignment to risk groups and influence the therapy decision-making process. Design and Methods. We prospectively studied, at diagnosis, 10 patients with AML-M4 Eo by cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with two cosmids (36 and 40), As a control group, 7 patients (5 with a diagnosis of AML other than M4 Eo and two cases of reactive eosinophilia) were analyzed. In addition reverse transcriptase chain reaction (RT-PCR) studies were carried out in 6 cases. Results. Karyotypic analysis detected the inv(16) in all but one of the patients with M4-Eo while none of the control cases showed any abnormality on chromosome 16, FISH studies showed that all 10 patients had abnormalities on chromosome 16; the patient with normal karyotype showed an inv(16) by FISH, while a case with inv(16) by cytogenetics had a t(16;16) by FISH. RT-PCR demonstrated amplification of the CBFB/MYH11 product in all cases analyzed, Interpretation and Conclusions. In patients with M4Eo and rearrangements of chromosome 16, FISH studies may afford more complete information than conventional cytogenetics and can be an alternative to RT-PCR studies. (C) 2000, Ferrata Storti Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 485
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Implications of Cytogenetic Heterogeneity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with inv(16)/t(16;16)/CBFB::MYH11
    Fu, Lucy
    Alvey, Emily
    Xia, Zongjun
    Sukhanova, Madina
    Aqil, Barina
    Gao, Juehua
    Ji, Peng
    Behdad, Amir
    Wolniak, Kristy
    Chen, Qing
    Chen, Yi-Hua
    Lu, Xinyan
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S1135 - S1136
  • [22] Detection of translocation (16;16) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using 16 telomer's probes
    Dar, H
    Ziv, M
    Bar-El, H
    Arbov, L
    Dan, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2000, 110 (02) : 247 - 247
  • [23] Genomic Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21) and inv(16)
    Motyko, Ekaterina
    Kirienko, Anna
    Kustova, Dariya
    Prygunova, Mariya
    Uspenskaya, Olga
    Karyagina, Elena
    Shuvaev, Vasilii
    Voloshin, Sergey
    Sidorkevich, Sergey
    Martynkevich, Irina
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 : S295 - S296
  • [24] Prognosis of inv(16)/t(16;16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML):: a survey of 110 cases from the French AML Intergroup
    Delaunay, J
    Vey, N
    Leblanc, T
    Fenaux, P
    Rigal-Huguet, F
    Witz, F
    Lamy, T
    Auvrignon, A
    Blaise, D
    Pigneux, A
    Mugneret, F
    Bastard, C
    Dastugue, N
    Van den Akker, J
    Fière, D
    Reiffers, J
    Castaigne, S
    Leverger, G
    Harousseau, JL
    Dombret, H
    BLOOD, 2003, 102 (02) : 462 - 469
  • [25] New probes for two color FISH detection of inv(16) (p13q22) in AML m4Eo
    Dauwerse, H
    Van der Reljden, B
    Smit, B
    Beverstock, G
    van Ommen, GJ
    Hagemeijer, A
    Breuning, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 6 : 99 - 99
  • [26] AML M4EO with pericentric inversion 16 is a favorable subtype of acute myeloid leukemia: Results of 70 patients treated in the AMLCG-Trial
    Haferlach, T
    Loffler, H
    Schoch, R
    Gassmann, W
    Fonatsch, C
    Schoch, C
    Schlegelberger, B
    Ludwig, WD
    Heinecke, A
    Sauerland, MC
    Hiddemann, W
    Buchner, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1996, 93 : 832 - 832
  • [27] Clinical implications of additional chromosomal abnormalities in adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv (16)/t(16;16)/CBFB::MYH11
    Gao, Juehua
    Santana-Santos, Lucas
    Fu, Lucy
    Alvey, Emily
    Chen, Qing
    Wolniak, Kristy
    Xia, Zongjun
    Aqil, Barina
    Behdad, Amir
    Ji, Peng
    Sukhanova, Madina
    Abaza, Yasmin
    Altman, Jessica K.
    Chen, Yi-Hua
    Lu, Xinyan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2024, 112 (06) : 964 - 974
  • [28] INVERSION-16 AND TRANSLOCATION (16-16) IN ANLL M4EO BREAK IN THE SAME SUBREGION OF THE SHORT ARM OF CHROMOSOME-16
    WESSELS, HW
    DAUWERSE, HG
    BREUNING, MH
    BEVERSTOCK, GC
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1991, 57 (02) : 225 - 228
  • [29] Secondary genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16) or t(16;16): a study of the German-Austrian AMLStudy Group (AMLSG)
    Paschka, Peter
    Du, Juan
    Schlenk, Richard F.
    Gaidzik, Verena I.
    Bullinger, Lars
    Corbacioglu, Andrea
    Spaeth, Daniela
    Kayser, Sabine
    Schlegelberger, Brigitte
    Krauter, Juergen
    Ganser, Arnold
    Koehne, Claus-Henning
    Held, Gerhard
    von Lilienfeld-Toal, Marie
    Kirchen, Heinz
    Rummel, Mathias
    Goetze, Katharina
    Horst, Heinz-August
    Ringhoffer, Mark
    Luebbert, Michael
    Wattad, Mohammed
    Salih, Helmut R.
    Kuendgen, Andrea
    Doehner, Hartmut
    Doehner, Konstanze
    BLOOD, 2013, 121 (01) : 170 - 177
  • [30] AML M4EO with pericentric inversion 16 is a favorable subtype of acute myeloid leukemia: Results of 65 patients treated in the AMLCG-trial.
    Haferlach, T
    Loffler, H
    Gassmann, W
    Schoch, R
    Fonatsch, C
    Schoch, C
    Schlegelberger, B
    Ludwig, WD
    Becher, R
    Thiel, E
    Heinecke, A
    Sauerland, MC
    Buchner, T
    BLOOD, 1995, 86 (10) : 3034 - 3034