Peacebuilding think tanks, Indian foreign policy and the Kashmir conflict

被引:4
|
作者
Bhatnagar, Stuti [1 ]
Chacko, Priya [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Polit & Int Relat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Indian foreign policy; Kashmir; Pakistan; peace process; state transformation; think tanks;
D O I
10.1080/01436597.2019.1642743
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Foreign policy making in India is typically viewed as highly centralised and dominated by the Prime Minister's Office and bureaucracy. Yet in 2004, the Congress-Party-led United Progressive Alliance government launched a Composite Dialogue with Pakistan which included a place for Indian think tanks in the Kashmir dispute. We suggest that as India liberalised its economy amidst domestic political upheaval, think tanks were given greater access to domestic and foreign funding and adopted new roles in foreign policy making. In the case of the Kashmir conflict, peacebuilding think tanks were encouraged by the government to engage in cross-border activities that would build constituencies for peace with Pakistan and promote economic cooperation as an incentive for peace. While the government aimed to depoliticise the conflict, these think tanks used this opportunity to draw attention to marginalised perspectives and issues. Peacebuilding think tanks nonetheless faced significant challenges in shaping the peace process because of structural constraints regarding access to resources and lack of autonomy to further their agendas. This reflected resistance within the state to depoliticising a conflict that has long been India's central national security issue.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1515
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise
    Abelson, D
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2005, 120 (02) : 326 - 328
  • [42] Think tanks, education and elite policy actors
    Savage, Glenn C.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2016, 43 (01): : 35 - 53
  • [43] Russian and Turkish Foreign Policy Think Tanks: Institutional Barriers to Influence over Decision-Making
    Adil, Cagri
    [J]. ULUSLARARASI ILISKILER-INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2023, 20 (79): : 165 - 181
  • [44] Indian Foreign Policy
    Michael, Arndt
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2016, 14 (01) : 135 - +
  • [45] Conflict in the Indian Kashmir Valley II: psychosocial impact
    Kaz de Jong
    Saskia van de Kam
    Nathan Ford
    Kamalini Lokuge
    Silke Fromm
    Renate van Galen
    Brigg Reilley
    Rolf Kleber
    [J]. Conflict and Health, 2 (1)
  • [46] Conflict in the Indian Kashmir Valley I: exposure to violence
    Kaz de Jong
    Nathan Ford
    Saskia van de Kam
    Kamalini Lokuge
    Silke Fromm
    Renate van Galen
    Brigg Reilley
    Rolf Kleber
    [J]. Conflict and Health, 2 (1)
  • [47] Think-tanks and their roles on policy formation process
    Karakurt, Alper
    [J]. AMME IDARESI DERGISI, 2007, 40 (02): : 1 - +
  • [48] The Fifth Estate: Think Tanks, Public Policy, and Governance
    Kuznetsov, Nikita D.
    [J]. MIROVAYA EKONOMIKA I MEZHDUNARODNYE OTNOSHENIYA, 2018, 62 (06): : 125 - 128
  • [49] Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise.
    Medvetz, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (01): : 271 - 273
  • [50] Think-Tanks, Social Democracy and Social Policy
    Abelson, Donald E.
    [J]. PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2013, 66 (04) : 894 - 902