The Effects of Agricultural Technological Progress on Deforestation: What Do We Really Know?

被引:44
|
作者
Villoria, Nelson B. [1 ]
Byerlee, Derek [1 ]
Stevenson, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Ctr Global Trade Anal, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Deforestation; Technological change; Jevons paradox; Agricultural productivity; GLOBAL LAND-USE; UNITED-STATES; LABOR-MARKETS; INTENSIFICATION; GLOBALIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; ECONOMICS; PATTERNS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1093/aepp/ppu005
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Increasing agricultural yields seem an obvious way to satisfy increasing demands for food and fuel while minimizing expansion of agriculture into forest areas; however, an influential literature worries that promoting agricultural innovation could enhance agriculture's profitability thereby encouraging deforestation. Clarifying the effects of agricultural technological progress on deforestation is therefore crucial for designing effective policy responses to the challenges faced by global agriculture. In this article we review the empirical evidence on these effects and synthesize estimates of future global cropland expansion. Our main insights are that: (i) the empirical evidence on a positive link between regional technological progress and deforestation is much weaker than what seems generally accepted; (ii) at a global level, most analysts expect broad based technological progress to be land saving; however, composition effects are important as low-yield, land-abundant regions are likely to experience further land expansion. Toward the future, empirical work understanding how localized technological progress in agriculture transmits through international trade and commodity markets will help to bridge the gap between the findings of local, econometric, studies on the one hand and global, model based, studies on the other.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 237
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What do we really know about collisionless shocks?
    Krall, NA
    RESULTS OF THE IASTP PROGRAM, 1997, 20 (4-5): : 715 - 724
  • [42] Explaining Secessionism: What Do We Really Know About It?
    Requejo, Ferran
    Sanjaume-Calvet, Marc
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 9 (04): : 371 - 375
  • [43] Epidemiology of Neuropathic Pain: what do we really know?
    Smith, B. H.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON NEUROPATHIC PAIN (NEUPSIG), 2010, : 79 - 88
  • [44] Skills - do we really know what kind of knowledge they are?
    Birch, Jens Erling
    SPORT ETHICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2016, 10 (03) : 237 - 250
  • [45] The pathology report: what do we really need to know?
    Wells, C.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (07): : 164 - 165
  • [46] What Do We Really Know About Intralymphatic Immunotherapy?
    Klimek L.
    Senti G.
    Hoffmann H.J.
    Kündig T.
    Current Treatment Options in Allergy, 2018, 5 (4) : 415 - 423
  • [47] Misinvoicing in mineral trade: what do we really know?
    Ostensson, Olle
    MINERAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 31 (1-2) : 77 - 86
  • [48] Management of uterine leiomyomata: What do we really know?
    Myers, ER
    Barber, MD
    Gustilo-Ashby, T
    Couchman, G
    Matchar, DB
    McCrory, DC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (01): : 8 - 17
  • [49] Revisiting the 'nuclear species' concept: do we really know what we think we know?
    Bangal, Priti
    Sridhar, Hari
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 378 (1878)
  • [50] Damage control orthopedics - What do we really know?
    Steinhausen, E.
    Lefering, R.
    Sauerland, S.
    Maegelel, M.
    Wutzler, S.
    Neugebauer, E.
    Bouillon, B.
    Rixen, D.
    SHOCK, 2008, 29 : 23 - 24