Child care decisions: parental choice or chance?

被引:8
|
作者
Anderson, ES
Jackson, A
Wailoo, MP
Petersen, SA
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Leicester Warwick Med Sch, Div Med Educ, Leicester LE1 9HN, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Child Hlth, Leicester LE1 9HN, Leics, England
关键词
child care decisions; environmental influences; maternal well-being; affluence and deprivation; parental education;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2214.2002.00288.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Aim A study of the context of child care decision making by inner city and suburban mothers, using parents to help develop and administer a semi-structured questionnaire. Methods A total of 131 mothers were interviewed (73 inner city and 58 suburban) at home. Results Inner city mothers were more likely to bottle feed, smoke and adopt risky infant sleeping positions, for example the settee. Virtually all babies (98%) were fully vaccinated and placed prone (95%) to sleep at night. Inner city mothers smoked (71%) despite the known health risks and continued postnatally (55%), mainly as a means of relieving stress. In total, 30% of inner city mothers wanted to breast feed; 19% had succeeded to 6-8 weeks postnatally. Bottle feeding helped both mother and baby to have uninterrupted nights of sleep. Suburban mothers (59%) succeeded in breast feeding, with others choosing bottle feeding mostly because of returning to work. The average weekly alcohol consumption, 32 units inner city and 15 units suburban, was taken in weekend binges by inner city parents, but in daily small amounts by suburban mothers. Conclusions The well-being of the baby was the prime concern of all mothers, irrespective of social background. However, inner city mothers made rational decisions to smoke and bottle feed to reduce the impact of stress and allow the mother much needed respite for the good of the entire family.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 401
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chance and Choice
    Giorgis, Elizabeth
    [J]. NKA-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY AFRICAN ART, 2008, (22-23) : 198 - 199
  • [22] CHOICE NOT CHANCE
    GRACE, M
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1993, 174 (07) : 223 - 223
  • [24] ON CHANCE + CHOICE
    HAWKINS, D
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1964, 36 (02) : 512 - +
  • [25] State regulations and child care choice
    Sandra L. Hofferth
    Duncan D. Chaplin
    [J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 1998, 17 : 111 - 140
  • [26] State regulations and child care choice
    Hofferth, SL
    Chaplin, DD
    [J]. POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW, 1998, 17 (02) : 111 - 140
  • [27] THE PLACED CHILD EXAMINES THE QUALITY OF PARENTAL CARE
    LEVINE, KG
    [J]. CHILD WELFARE, 1988, 67 (04) : 301 - 310
  • [28] Parental satisfaction of child's perioperative care
    Shafer, Jonathan S.
    Jenkins, Brooke N.
    Fortier, Michelle A.
    Stevenson, Robert S.
    Hikita, Natasha
    Zuk, Jeannie
    Gold, Jeffrey I.
    Golianu, Brenda
    Kaplan, Sherrie H.
    Mayes, Linda
    Kain, Zeev N.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2018, 28 (11) : 955 - 962
  • [29] The Element of Parental Identification in the Child Care Institution
    Hallowitz, David
    [J]. SOCIAL CASEWORK, 1952, 33 (01): : 24 - 30
  • [30] IS CHANCE THEORY CHILD OF CHANCE
    COUMET, E
    [J]. ANNALES-ECONOMIES SOCIETES, 1970, 25 (03): : 574 - 598